ET Contact: Dr. Steven Greer Pt.12

ET Contact: Dr. Steven Greer Pt.11

ET Contact: Dr. Steven Greer Pt.10

ET Contact: Dr. Steven Greer Pt.9

ET Contact: Dr. Steven Greer Pt.8

ET Contact: Dr. Steven Greer Pt.7

ET Contact: Dr. Steven Greer Pt.6

ET Contact: Dr. Steven Greer Pt.5

ET Contact: Dr. Steven Greer Pt.4

ET Contact: Dr. Steven Greer Pt.3

ET Contact: Dr. Steven Greer Pt.2

The NWO Reptilian Truth

reptilian

Secret Underground Bases - A.W.A.R.E. Command

Secret Underwater Bases Pt.4

Most Genuine Aliens Photos (1950s-2000s)

Top Extra Secret Underground Alien Bases. Part2

Muslim

From the rising of the sun to the going down of the same there is always another story and another piece of the puzzle, some more information…just enough information got through…so that we could formulate a reason and a message to deliver onto you.
This site is for your reading enjoyment; you draw your own conclusion of what is false and what is true…
My people parish for lack of information…

World War IV: The Early Days, May 10 2002
· undemocratic Muslim countries really dislike us all that much? Who can
· ``Muslim rage'' in an article in the
· attacks] has involved a Muslim or an Arab, raising the specter of racial
· . . . rejected by Muslim scholars and the vast majority of Muslim
· American officials are still waiting for Muslim politicians to
· U.S. diplomat.They don't because the Muslim world is bursting with
· is a very, very, very, very good Muslim." A Kenyan adds: "Every Muslim
· represents Islam." In France, Muslim youths chant bin Laden's name as
· Muslim world.
· The wide and deep Muslim enthusiasm for bin Laden is an extremely
· "You, who have always caused blows to Iran's interests, how dare you request help (from us) in order to attack the innocent Muslim nation of Afghanistan which has suffered
· Breaking ranks with allies reaching out to the Muslim world, Silvio
· Islamic Scholars Say U.S. Muslim Soldiers Must Fight for Country
· Muslim chaplain serving in the U.S. military, Army Capt. Abdul-Rasheed
· Muhammad, 48, the first Muslim chaplain ever appointed in the U.S. armed
· innocents in combat, the scholars said that when "a Muslim is a citizen of
· reservation or harm to the soldiers, or to the other American Muslim
· "To sum up, it's acceptable -- God willing -- for the Muslim American
· Muslim world since his tenure as Secretary of the Navy in the late
· 2001-sep-9: Iraq wants Muslim condemnation of US attacks
· Limit of 20 matched lines per file exceeded...

Chapter 7: Is there an Asian Economic Model, Mar 21 2000
Consider the geographical scope of Asia. In economic terms the reference is really to East or South East Asia, a region stretching from Japan as far west as Thailand and Malaysia and as far south as Indonesia. To Western eyes, this may seem like a coherent group of countries, but there are major differences. The Catholic Philippines and a largely Protestant Korea contrast with Muslim Indonesia, communist China and Vietnam, Buddhist Thailand and mainly agnostic Japan. Singapore and Malaysia contain a rich racial mix, while Korea and Japan are very homogenous societies. All were embroiled in a regional war fifty years ago (and some more recently), for which the aggressor has shown little remorse. Important territorial disputes remain. (As recently as June 20, 1997, Philippine troops fired warning shots in order to drive Chinese fishing boats away from the contested Spratly Islands. Other islands are also the subject of regional territorial disputes including the Kuriles (involving Japan and Russia) and the Senkaku Islands (involving China, Japan and Taiwan).) Japan, Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore have three decades or more of democracy (of sorts), while Korea, the Philippines, Taiwan and Thailand are more recent converts. The people of China and Hong Kong have little say in how their country is run. If businessmen from two countries of the region converse the language used is more likely to be English than any other (unless they are both ethnic Chinese).

AMPP: Defining America, Feb 1 2005
you be an agnostic or atheist or Buddhist or Muslim and a believing American
It should be clear to all that Islam -- the faith of one-fifth of humanity -- is consistent with democratic rule. Democratic progress is found in many predominantly Muslim countries -- in Turkey and Indonesia, and Senegal and Albania, Niger and Sierra Leone. Muslim men and women are good citizens of India and South Africa, of the nations of Western Europe, and of the United States of America.
Governments across the Middle East and North Africa are beginning to see the need for change. Morocco has a diverse new parliament; King Mohammed has urged it to extend the rights to women. Here is how His Majesty explained his reforms to parliament: "How can society achieve progress while women, who represent half the nation, see their rights violated and suffer as a result of injustice, violence, and marginalization, notwithstanding the dignity and justice granted to them by our glorious religion?" The King of Morocco is correct: The future of Muslim nations will be better for all with the full participation of women. (Applause.)
These vital principles are being applies in the nations of Afghanistan and Iraq. With the steady leadership of President Karzai, the people of Afghanistan are building a modern and peaceful government. Next month, 500 delegates will convene a national assembly in Kabul to approve a new Afghan constitution. The proposed draft would establish a bicameral parliament, set national elections next year, and recognize Afghanistan's Muslim identity, while protecting the rights of all citizens. Afghanistan faces continuing economic and security challenges -- it will face those challenges as a free and stable democracy. (Applause.)
One of the first to vote was President Ghazi al-Yawar, a Sunni Muslim Arab with a large tribal following, who cast his ballot inside Baghdad's fortress-like Green Zone.
AMPP: Ancient Rites, May 8 2005
the exception tends to prove the rule: only the Muslim immigrant
People are designed to communicate through language, but they speak English, French or Chinese because of the part of the world they grew up in. Similarly, genetic makeup urges people to believe in a Creator or find spiritual fulfillment, but culture, history and environment determine whether one is a Christian, Hindu, Jew, Buddhist or Muslim.
Take a look at Europe. The native Europeans are almost totally secularized. They're experiencing a negative growth rate. But their countries are flooded with immigrants with strong religious orientations, many of them Muslim. The demographics in Europe are changing. Over there, the replacement population looks different. In America, they look the same as the rest of us. But it's the same phenomenon. You see the rise [of religious fundamentalism] in Europe among the immigrant population.
Asked about the spiritual history of the residents, Lukwago said most of them were staunch believers, who did not believe in demons, adding that the Muslim community constituted the largest percentage.
One of the other witnesses was a Turkish newspaper columnist with no science background but a nearly 10-year-old interest in intelligent design. Mustafa Akyol testified that the naturalistic bias in Kansas' science standards contributes to the ill will between the Muslim world and the United States.
There are lessons here for us today. If, for example, you think the Palestinian national movement headed by Yasser Arafat seeks only to form a state within the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, then the answer to the problem is to get the Israelis to make way. If, however, you think Palestinians are in the grip of a fantasy ideology, acting as the vanguard for a Muslim counterattack against a latter-day Crusader state, then granting a Palestinian state becomes a bit like allowing Hitler to march into the Rhineland: It perpetuates a fantasy that deserves to die.
over the Muslim world through schools and through the media, through
``You buy the same things with the money whether it has the same message or not,'' Langan says. ``You don't have to worry about it. No one is going to ask you if you're Protestant, Catholic, Jewish or Muslim. They'll just take the money.''
belief systems - Sumerian, Zoroastrian, Jewish, Christian, and Muslim
Elysium, Christian heaven and hell, or Muslim Falak al aflak - are
Several Muslim cattle traders have been assaulted, and their animals have
Asked if Muslim mosques or Buddhist temples should be eligible for money,
Incarnations: None, as only God is worshipped. Muhammad is revered as the last and greatest of about 124 Prophets/Messengers. Jesus Christ was a Prophet/Messenger of miraculous birth who performed miracles, ascended to heaven before crucifixion, and will return as a Muslim -- but he was not an incarnation of God.
All this would be rather puzzling if your background was entirely secular, but it would be very familiar indeed if you adhered to another monotheistic world religion, Islam. In some respects, Muslim beliefs about Mary--the most honoured woman in Islam, and the only one to have an entire chapter named after her in the Koran--seem to be quite close to those of the Roman Catholics. The Islamic tradition holds that Jesus and his mother are the only two human souls who were not touched by Satan at birth.
In other respects, the Muslim understanding of Mary seems close to that of the eastern Christians. Both cherish the story of Mary's childhood in a place of supreme holiness that had hitherto been a bastion of male priests. Both name Mary's guardian as the priest Zechariah or Zakariya. In Islam the story is told of Zakariya bringing food to the child Mary and finding that she had already been given nourishment by God; this is cited as a sign of her extreme receptivity to God. In Orthodox Christianity it is stressed that Mary was born an ordinary human, burdened like others with the capacity to sin.
First, the Christian (and Muslim) story of the young Mary going into the heart of the Temple indicates, in Mrs Barker's view, that sex is transcended in the divine reality that Jewish high priests entered when they made their annual procession into the holy of holies. There is thus, she argues, a sense in which the priest entering the holy of holies ceases to be male. Mrs Barker, a Methodist preacher herself, concludes that this journey to a ``place beyond gender'' can be made by a person of either sex, and there is no reason why women cannot be Christian priests. Conservatives may regard this as feminist claptrap but, whatever they believe about that thorny topic, many Christians may be sympathetic to the stress that Mrs Barker lays on the traditional story of Mary's early life among the temple priests, in a place of pure holiness where nobody except an elite caste of males had ever been.
Having spent most of last year traveling through the Muslim
``The urge to destroy may not come from Islam, but creation is not Islam's strong suit either. In his immense book "The Creators," historian Daniel Boorstin explains the Islamic approach to innovation. While Judaism and Christianity begin with the Creation, Islam reveres a God who creates nothing. It is a central tenet of Islam that God did not even create the Koran. According to Boorstin, mullahs explain that since "the speech of God is uncreate, the words must be eternal uncreate." The world comes into being not by God's energy and initiative, but by fiat. As Boorstin says: "For a believing Muslim, to create is a rash and dangerous act."''
The depravity of this is hard to believe, but believe it we must. For it is the new reality of this current age in which innocents are specifically targeted by Muslim terrorists in the name of some Islamic cause. In Russia, the murderers were Chechens, aided by Arabs believed to be allied with al Qaeda. And so the children of Beslan join the ranks of other victims of Islamic terror--in a Moscow theater, a Bali nightclub, a Karachi church, and the Twin Towers of New York.
As should be obvious by now, the war on terror cannot be won only by disrupting terrorist networks and shoring up homeland defenses. It is also a war of ideas, and as such can be won only if the widespread ideological support for terrorism found in the Muslim world and some quarters of the West can be transformed into widespread condemnation.
Limit of 20 matched lines per file exceeded...

AMPP: Hating America, Apr 13 2005
Although anti-Americanism is genuinely widespread among Arab governments and peoples, however, there is something seriously misleading in this account. Arab and Muslim hatred of the United States is not just, or even mainly, a response to actual U.S. policies -- policies that, if anything, have been remarkably pro-Arab and pro-Muslim over the years. Rather, such animus is largely the product of self-interested manipulation by various groups within Arab society, groups that use anti-Americanism as a foil to distract public attention from other, far more serious problems within those societies.
What makes this strategy remarkable, however, is the reality of past U.S. policy toward the region. Obviously, the United States, like all countries, has tried to pursue a foreign policy that accords with its own interests. But the fact remains that these interests have generally coincided with those of Arab leaders and peoples. For example, the United States may have had its own reasons for saving Kuwait from annexation by Iraq's secular dictatorship in 1991 -- mainly to preserve cheap oil. But U.S. policy was still, in effect, pro-Kuwaiti, pro-Muslim, and pro-Arab. After all, Washington could have used the war as a pretext to seize Kuwait's oil fields for itself or demand lower prices or political concessions in exchange for fighting off Iraq. Instead, U.S. leaders did none of these things and sought the widest possible support for their actions among Arabs and Muslims.
All the same, when conflicts in the region did erupt during the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s pitting Islamists against more moderate governments, the United States avoided taking sides. During Iran's 1979 revolution, for example, although Washington clearly wanted the shah to survive, it nonetheless restrained him from taking tougher actions to save his throne. And once the revolution had succeeded, President Jimmy Carter then sought to conciliate the new Islamist government. (It was American contact with moderates in the new regime, in fact, that provoked the seizure of the U.S. embassy in Tehran in November 1979.) Although the United States did not want Iran to spread its radical Islamism throughout the Muslim world, it nonetheless sought the best possible relations with Tehran in order to minimize its cooperation with Moscow. And even though relations subsequently soured, Washington has never seriously tried to overthrow the Islamic government; on the contrary, it has periodically sought detente with Tehran.
Over the years, the United States has also spent blood and treasure saving Muslims in Afghanistan from the Soviets; in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia from Iraq; and in Bosnia and Kosovo from Yugoslavia. It has supported Muslim Pakistan against India and Muslim Turkey against Greece. Washington has courted Damascus, even tacitly accepting Syria's control over Lebanon. The United States supported Arab Iraq against Persian Iran during the Iran-Iraq War and also refrained from overthrowing Saddam Hussein after pushing him out of Kuwait in 1991.
For decades, the United States kept its forces out of the Persian Gulf to avoid offending Arabs and Muslims there. They entered, in fact, only when invited in to protect Arab oil tankers against Iran and to save Kuwait from Iraq. In Somalia, where no vital U.S. interests were at stake, the United States engaged in a humanitarian effort to help a Muslim people suffering from anarchy and murderous warlords.
Third, Washington's real record is constantly distorted. The United States, for example, is blamed for the suffering of Muslims whom it protected in Kosovo and Bosnia. U.S. humanitarian efforts in Somalia are portrayed as part of an imperialistic, anti-Muslim campaign defeated by heroic local resistance.
There are, of course, legitimate Arab and Muslim grievances against the United States. But put into accurate perspective -- and compared to the legitimate anti-American complaints of people in other regions, not to mention American grievances with Arab states -- the level of violence or hatred such grievances provoke in the Middle East seems grossly disproportionate. In fact, Arabs and Muslims have suffered far less from U.S. policies than many other groups or peoples. Yet virtually none of these other peoples evinces anything like the level of anti-American sentiment that exists in the Middle East or commits acts of terrorism against the United States.
To be effective, anti-Americanism must therefore persuade masses and leaders that the United States is simultaneously horrible and helpless, and that it will not do anything if it is attacked, ridiculed, or disregarded. Powerless against their own dictators and dysfunctional polities and dissatisfied with their societies, every Arab or Muslim may at least feel it possible to spit on the United States and get away with it.
1 Muslim versus non-Muslim states: Turkey vs. Greece, Bosnia vs. Yugoslavia, Kosovo vs. Yugoslavia, Pakistan vs. India, Afghans vs. Soviets, and Azerbaijan vs. Armenia. Arab versus non-Arab states: Iraq vs. Iran. Muslim states versus secular forces: Saudi Arabia and other monarchies vs. Egypt, Jordan and other regimes vs. Syria and Iraq, and Kuwait and Saudi Arabia vs. Iraq.
In his lengthy study, which is being circulated in many Muslim countries, Silwadi noted that the US has often been compared to a tree that grows very quickly and bears fruit, but has no roots.
countries and fifty-five Muslim countries.’ He:’ The Jews have no right to
relentlessly for the fifth week running. This is true not only in Arab and other Muslim countries, where the U.S. military campaign has provoked popular outrage, but in other
Public support in Kenya for the U.S. campaign appears to be holding firm, despite a demonstration in the heavily Muslim port city of Mombasa that turned into a riot. That
. . . rejected by Muslim scholars and the vast majority of Muslim
American officials are still waiting for Muslim politicians to
U.S. diplomat.They don't because the Muslim world is bursting with
is a very, very, very, very good Muslim." A Kenyan adds: "Every Muslim
represents Islam." In France, Muslim youths chant bin Laden's name as
Muslim world.
The wide and deep Muslim enthusiasm for bin Laden is an extremely
Limit of 20 matched lines per file exceeded...
The BCCI Affair - 3 THE ORIGIN AND EARLY YEARS OF BCCI, Apr 25 1997
of Muslim India in the final period of British rule prior to
the new Muslim state of Pakistan, but remained forever regarded
a clannish class of Muslim professionals who kept themselves
AMPP: The Systems Method: Bilderberg and Club of Rome, Jul 2 2004
Muslim neighbors.
Muslim resupply was, of course, blocked by "the UN arms embargo."
Solidarity With Terror (Continued), Jul 13 2004
ADC as a civil rights organization for Muslim-Americans in no way involved
“Instead of OCCUPATION say MILITARY OCCUPATION to make people think the occupation is a MILITARY DICTATORSHIP.” The only military dictator in Israel and the West Bank is Yasser Arafat. The page this appeared on was supplied by the Muslim Public Affairs Council, yet another purportedly Muslim “civil rights group” like the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee.
/ampp/china/j51.html, Apr 9 2000
then Catholic, Protestant and Muslim leaders.
AMPP: Murder, Inc., Jul 20 2004
The emir was buried before sundown Saturday, a private and traditional Muslim ceremony in which his body was
Partners in Hate: Noam Chomsky and the Holocaust Deniers, Sep 30 2001
undermanned British police. (4) Many were saved by Muslim neighbors.*
the Muslim demonstration there the next day ... the bloody [Hebron] outbreaks
AMPP: Socialism Surveyed and in the Abstract, Feb 19 2005
Despite these qualifications, it still seems to me that those who value solidarity should take care that it is not eroded by a refusal to acknowledge the constraints upon it. The politician who has recently laid most stress on those constraints, especially in relation to immigration, is the home secretary, David Blunkett. He has spoken about the need for more integration of some immigrant communities - especially Muslim ones - while continuing to welcome high levels of net immigration into Britain of over 150,000 a year.
AMPP: European Socialism, Jun 12 2005
So Spain, bloodied by Islamic terror, does little today to aid the struggle for democracy in the Muslim world. Here, America's post-9/11 story passed through a post-modern European looking glass. The backpack bombs that claimed 191 lives on Madrid commuter trains that March 11 morning were expected to be a wake-up call about Islamic terrorism. How naïve. No, Spain blamed its own leaders, withdrew into a shell and opened old wounds from decades ago. A year later, Spain may be divided in spirit and, soon enough, in body. But Mr. Zapatero is more popular than ever.
Appeasement generates a mentality that allows Europe to ignore 300,000 victims of Saddam's torture and murder machinery and, motivated by the self-righteousness of the peace-movement, to issue bad grades to George Bush. A particularly grotesque form of appeasement is reacting to the escalating violence by Islamic fundamentalists in Holland and elsewhere by suggesting that we should really have a Muslim holiday in Germany.
The recent assassination of Dutch author and moviemaker, Theo van Gough, by a Muslim extremist in Amsterdam should come as no surprise to those familiar with the condition of multiculturalism in Holland.
concluded, among other things, that Muslim immigrants, who make up almost
up the Muslim ghettoes would be like trying to dissolve San Francisco’s Chinatown or New York’s Harlem.
Secondly, there is the little problem of Muslim fundamentalism that the dangerously
A substantial portion of the Muslim population Holland has imported since the sixties, while not violent, abhors Dutch society, the most liberal in all of Europe.
van Gogh’s death against mosques and a Muslim school.
This philosophy is as misplaced as it is ineffectual. As Muslim attorney Waleed Aly recently wrote in the newspaper the Australian, responding to a controversy over Christmas decorations in Sydney: "Denying the Christianity in Christmas or, worse, doing away with it altogether, helps no one. This is not multiculturalism. It is anticulturalism."
This new Euro-Muslim entity — which she has dubbed “Eurabia” — has been consciously
The fallout has been cultural and demographic as well, as Bat Ye’or details in her forthcoming book, Eurabia. In exchange for the opening of Arab markets, Europeans encouraged Muslim immigration into Europe, discouraged
the biggest radical Muslim victory since 9/11, or even the Khomeini revolution
Osama bin Laden, if he is alive, and other radical Muslim terrorists will
Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and the author of Onward Muslim Soldiers: How Jihad Still Threatens America and the West (Regnery Publishing), and Islam Unveiled: Disturbing Questions About the World’s Fastest Growing Faith (Encounter Books).
The chairman of the coalition is one Andrew Murray, a former employee of the Soviet Novosty Agency and leader in the British Communist party. Cochair is Muhammad Asalm Ijaz of the London Council of Mosques. Members include John Rees of the Socialist Workers' party and Ghayassudin Siddiqui of the Muslim Parliament. Tanja Salem of the Al-awdah (The Return) group, an outfit close to Yasser Arafat, is also a member along with Shahedah Vawda of "Just Peace," another militant Arab group, and Wolf Wayne of the "Green Socialist Network."
AMPP: North American Socialism, Jun 12 2005
Europe is also making the disenchanting journey from social democracy, but via a different route. Its elites had not foreseen that a virtually unchecked Muslim immigration might hijack the welfare state and poison the postwar culture of relative tolerance that supported its politics. To the contrary, Europe's leftist elites lulled the electorates into a false feeling of security that the new arrivals were simply doing the work that unprecedented low European birth rates were leaving undone. No social or cultural costs were to be incurred. Transaction closed. Well, it was not quite so simple. And, while the workforce still needs more workers, the economies of Europe have been dragged down by social guarantees to large families who do not always have a wage-earner in the house. So, even in the morally self-satisfied Scandinavian and Low Countries, the assuring left-wing bromides are no longer believed.
Muslim immigrants, and an anti-war rally October 26, 2002 in Washington,
hours (!) before, while excusing any possible Arab or Muslim links.
of law enforcement among the Muslim community while advising those who are
Of the two groups that organized the anti-Iraq protests, one was International ANSWER, a front group for the Worker's World party, which is a Marxist-Leninist party aligned with the Communist dictatorship in North Korea. The other -- a group the New York Times described as "moderate" -- was the Coalition United for Peace and Justice. It was led by Leslie Cagan, a veteran 60's leftist and pro-Castro enthusiast and a member of the Communist Party until after the fall of the Berlin Wall. The Coalition itself was composed of organizations that ranged from the Communist Party to Muslim supporters of the terrorists' jihad.
Before the fighting started in Iraq, some critics voiced a concern that an armed intervention would cause the "Arab street" to erupt and inflame the Muslim world. Such a criticism was voiced by Brent Scowcroft, the National Security Adviser in the previous Bush Administration. It was obviously made from legitimate concerns for America's security and (it may be said) a substantial amount of the criticism of the war in Iraq is based on similar concerns. Scowcroft's attack on the President's policy was a harsh criticism. He said that under no circumstances should the President go to war over Iraq. But it was obvious that Scowcroft's criticism was made from legitimate concerns about America's security, concerns which proved wrong when Saddam was toppled in the swiftest and least costly victory on historical record, and without the consequences that Scowcroft imagined.
These resolutions were passed by the majority of the nations who comprise the United Nations Security Council because Saddam Hussein invaded two countries - Iran and then Kuwait, and used chemical weapons on his own people. In passing, let me note that America's participation in the Iran/Iraq war has also been tremendously distorted by the political left in its effort to undermine American security and cause us to lose the war on terror. So let it be said that yes, we provided intelligence and some weapons to Iraq (most of their weapons came from the Soviet Union). That was to prevent Iran from winning the war, not because we were friends of Saddam Hussein or approved what he was doing, as leftists like Michael Moore and Norman Mailer and others have insinuated. It was Iran's radical Islamic government that launched the Muslim jihad against the West and coined the term "Great Satan" with which to label us. Iran has three times the population of Iraq. It was a prudent policy, therefore, to tilt to Saddam in order to prevent radical Islamists from conquering Iraq as well and controlling the Gulf and its oil. That's what our participation in this war was about, and it is just another slander of an America that is under attack to say that we "supported" Saddam Hussein. This is just one more leftist way of saying that America is an "outlaw" power and thus that there can be no moral basis for our war against Saddam.
In Saddam's eyes, we were ultimately a paper tiger. This is perhaps the main cause of his miscalculations that led to the second Gulf War. But that is, in fact, what we were until 9/11 -- a power that had been unable to put an army in the field for more than four days since 1973. On September 11, 2001, the world changed. It changed because the perceptions of an American president changed. President Bush understood that this act carried out against us was a declaration of war. He understood that the world we live in is a world in which terrorists who are supported by terrorist states like Saddam Hussein's can get access to resources, including chemical, biological, and soon nuclear weapons, which they can smuggle into the United States and use to do incalculable damage. America could not wait for such an attack to respond to the threat that these regimes represented. The consequences were unacceptable. Therefore, America had to strike before the threat became imminent. It had to act to promote democracy in the Muslim world or risk the creation of regime's like Saddam's which constituted a permanent threat to its own security and peace. That is the Bush doctrine. It was to engage the war that had been declared against us by the terrorists and the regimes -- Iran, Syria, Libya, North Korea, and others -- that "harbored" them.
Sami Al-Arian is hardly alone. Lynne Stewart, a National Lawyers Guild attorney, has also been indicted by John Ashcroft. Like Al-Arian, Stewart is defended by the ACLU and the American Association of University Professors. The Middle Eastern Studies Department at this university, headed by John Esposito, has spent years throwing a smoke screen over terrorist groups, defending terrorist leaders like Sami al-Arian, pretending that they are no threat to the United States and claiming, along with Salon.com and The Nation magazine, that the head of Palestine Islamic Jihad is being persecuted by Ashcroft simply because he's a Muslim and a Palestinian.
How is it possible that people who think of themselves as advocates of social justice can lend aid and comfort to Islamic radicals who behead people and blow women's heads off with AK-47s when they are suspected of having sexual relations outside of marriage? How can self-styled progressives embrace these people? They embrace them under the logic that the enemy of my enemy is my friend, and their enemy is the United States. They do it under the delusion that is common to all radicals. It's the radical analog to the 72 virgins that await jihadists in heaven. Think of how sick our enemy is. The Muslim martyrs in Palestine kill their own children by strapping bombs to them, to 14-year-olds, and telling them if they blow up Jewish 14-year-olds -- and if they are lucky enough to be male -- they will go straight to heaven and get 72 virgins. They're committing mass murder to get into paradise. That is exactly what the left does. Why does the left want to destroy America? To get into paradise. Call it socialism, call it Communism, call it social justice. It's a dream of paradise that is so enticing it will justify any crime necessary to achieve it.
One probably should not rest too much on the similarity between Bin Laden's last video and the newly available DVD of Fahrenheit 9/11. I would only say that, if Bin Laden had issued a tape that with equal fealty followed the playbook of Karl Rove (and do please by all means cross yourself at the mention of this unholy name), it might have garnered some more attention. The Bearded One moved pedantically through Moore's bill of indictment, checking off the Florida vote-count in 2000, the "Pet Goat" episode on the day of hell, the violent intrusion into hitherto peaceful and Muslim Iraq, and the division between Bush and the much nicer Europeans. (For some reason, unknown to me at any rate, he did not attack the President for allowing the Bin Laden family to fly out of American airspace.)
from terrorism, or advancing democracy in the Muslim Middle East, or
The striking characteristic of such judgments is that they, too, are wholly at odds with the known facts. Confident forecasts of American defeat take no notice of what is the largest and best-trained military in history, and fly in the face of recent American victories in the Gulf War (where, at the time, Anthony Lewis likewise predicted quagmire and disaster) and Kosovo, both achieved at the cost of scarcely any American casualties. Alleged American hatred of Muslims hardly comports with our record of saving Kuwaitis from fascist Iraqis, Kosovars and Bosnians from Christian Serbs, or Afghans from Russian communists and then from their own Islamist overlords, all the while providing billions of dollars in aid to Egypt, Jordan and the Palestinian Authority. It was Jordanians and Kuwaitis, not we and not Israelis, who ethnically cleansed Palestinians; Iraqis and Egyptians, not we, who gassed Muslim populations. And it is to our shores that Muslims weary of Middle Eastern despotism are desperate to emigrate.
Muslim world in a dialogue."
slavery-ridden past, and today's Muslim extremists who kill innocent
woman and child who was a Muslim on the Temple Mount. I can tell you that
"This is partly a Muslim issue, because there is a war raging within Islam.
We need to reach out and engage the Muslim world in a debate."
featured two interviews with Muslim clerics, one more anti-American than
Karadzic claimed he was just defending his Serb people from their Muslim
AMPP: Latin American Socialism, Apr 23 2005
At the end of the '70s, Cuba's Communist dictator, Fidel Castro, launched a new turn in Cuban foreign policy, sponsoring and arming a series of guerrilla offensives in Central America -- Nicaragua, El Salvador and Guatemala -- along the lines laid down by Regis Debray and Che Guevara a decade before. The leaders of these movements were generally not Indians but Hispanics, principally the disaffected middle- and upper-class scions of the ruling castes of those countries. They were often the graduates of cadre training centers in Moscow and Havana, and of terrorist training camps in Lebanon and East Germany. (The leaders of the Salvadoran guerrillas even included a Lebanese Communist and Shi'ite Muslim named Shafik Handal.)
/ampp/cosmology-old.html, Aug 25 2001
systems - Sumerian, Zoroastrian, Jewish, Christian, and Muslim - are
Viruses of the Mind, Mar 21 2000
book. By the way, the apparently opposite symptom of ``sympathy'' for Muslim
AMPP: Eco-Psychos and Animal Supremacists, Feb 25 2005
Environmental fanatics, like Muslim ones, have been known to resort to terrorism,
as well as foreign, Christian and secular as well as Muslim.
see it as unstoppable as some "moderate" Muslim nations view radical Islam.
Returning to Eden - The Eden Motif, May 7 2005
For radical socialists, such as are to be found in the psychiatric profession (e.g. Bruce Rind, Phillip Tromovitch and Robert Bauserman), the garbling of the childhood and romance motifs, and the phylogenetic neoteny of the human adult female, lead to open advocation for the social acceptance and proliferation of pedophilia. (This garbling, and institutionalized paternalism and in some cases celibacy, likely contribute to the proliferation of pedophilia among Christian and Muslim clergy.) Seeming to countervail this agitation for sexual disinhibition, socialists have instigated a witchhunt for men who engage in sexually suggestive or provocative behavior with female business associates. However, in fact this is simply a program to harm and demoralize businessmen and businesses (who flagrantly offend against socialism), protest behavior that evidences inequality of the genders, and persecute those who exhibit them. Indeed, long-established in radical feminism is the political strategy of granting sexual favours to politically compliant partners and withholding them from defiant ones. Arguably, Genesis suggests that Eve had just such a defiant and dominant streak, since she communed with the Garden serpent independently, and prevailed upon Adam thereafter, whereas there is no example of Adam prevailing on Eve in Eden.

Returning to Eden - Progenitors of Edenism, May 9 2005
3. The Muslim heaven or elysium.
AMPP: Enslaving Speech, Jun 14 2005
'Canada is a pleasantly authoritarian country," Alan Borovoy, general counsel of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said a few years ago. An example of what he means is Bill C-250, a repressive, anti-free-speech measure that is on the brink of becoming law in Canada. It would add "sexual orientation" to the Canadian hate propaganda law, thus making public criticism of homosexuality a crime. It is sometimes called the "Bible as Hate Literature" bill, or simply "the chill bill." It could ban publicly expressed opposition to gay marriage or any other political goal of gay groups. The bill has a loophole for religious opposition to homosexuality, but few scholars think it will offer protection, given the strength of the gay lobby and the trend toward censorship in Canada. Law Prof. David Bernstein, in his new book You Can't Say That! wrote that "it has apparently become illegal in Canada to advocate traditional Christian opposition to homosexual sex." Or traditional Jewish or Muslim opposition, too.
Christianity is fair game and so is Judaism. But you never hear these comics, brave defenders of free speech they pretend to be, having a go at Islam. We don't hear -- at least on the mainstream shows -- jokes about the so-called "honor killings" of Muslim girls or about allegations of wife-beating and worse. There are always scores of jokes going the rounds about Mary's virginity, but never a one about Muhammad. Do the "enlightened" liberals among the chattering classes think it not offensive to see Victoria Beckham dressed as the Blessed Virgin? There may be Muslim comedians who joke about their own religion -- more likely in private clubs than in public settings -- but I've never heard of them.
Griffin, later released on bail until next March, told reporters on Tuesday: "This is an electoral scam to get the Muslim block vote back for the Labour Party."
Another member told how he put dog faeces through an Asian shop's letterbox, while a third described how he beat up a Muslim man. "I'm kicking away...it was fantastic," he said.
The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), the biggest lobby group for the country's 1.8 million Muslims, also welcomed the arrests, saying it hoped police would now press charges.
For example, a person hawking girlie calendars in a conservative Muslim land is clearly violating the laws there, as is someone who knowingly ships wine to a dry county. Generally, laws governing such issues have considered whether the seller was actively trying to promote products to a population that's banned from buying them.
How nauseating it has been, in the aftermath of the attacks by Muslim fanatics, to watch the first big defeat for freedom of thought and speech as tens of thousands of Americans demanded the head of Politically Incorrect host Bill Maher and came away with enough of Maher's noggin to parade through the public square.If you are in a semicomatose state and have not heard, Maher, while talking to author Dinesh D'Souza on his September 17 show, said: "We have been the cowards, lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. That's cowardly. Staying in the airplane when it hits the building, say what you want about it, it's not cowardly."
· The CIA funded the movement of tens of thousands of Muslim radicals from all over the world into Afghanistan to fight the Russians. We trained them and we armed them, even as bin Laden's clerics initiated them into his extreme Wahabbi sect of Islam. As the war wound down, these radicals fanned out all over the world as bin Laden's new agents, with new names and new identities.
top U.S. officials and air the views of American Muslim clerics.
Frank Gaffney exposes Grover Norquist's compromise by Islamists, Dec 11 2003
Institute’s stated purpose was to cultivate Muslim-Americans and Arab-Americans
the prime-mover behind the American Muslim Council (AMC) and a number of
him and his associates to secure the right to select, train and certify Muslim
the end of the 1990s, an AMC spin-off called the American Muslim Armed Forces
U.S. Muslim chaplains.4 One of these
train “soldiers and civilians to provide spiritual guidance when paid Muslim
Muslim Council and its leader with suspicion, or worse.
the extent of the access, influence and legitimacy the American Muslim Council
that time, the Saudi Ministry of Religious Affairs established the Muslim
dominating the Muslim world and, in due course, forcing the non-Muslim world
as a “secretive group of tightly connected Muslim charities, think tanks
is a Muslim Palestinian by birth. Prior to joining Alamoudi’s group (where
he served for almost three years15), Saffuri was active in Muslim-support operations in Bosnia,16a
state-sponsor of terrorism); the innocent nature of the process whereby Muslim
women in the Muslim world; and efforts to promote Islamic causes and candidates
fact that Alamoudi’s American Muslim Council was among the groups invited
astonished to discover that it was dignifying so-called Muslim leaders who
for facilitating the President’s Muslim outreach, who profess to support
National Advisor on Arab and Muslim Affairs.21 Holding
Muslim populations (notably, Michigan, Florida and New Jersey), Saffuri and
Limit of 20 matched lines per file exceeded...
AMPP: Genocide, Apr 1 2005
Sri Lanka and has changed his identity by becoming a Muslim. Tears
Assad has not been a peacemaker with his own Muslim neighbors. He supports
Jerusalem conquered 7/15/1099 more than 60,000 victims (jewish, muslim, men, women, children). [WW37-40](In the words of one witness: "there [in front of Solomon's temple] was such a carnage that our people were wading ankle-deep in the blood of our foes", and after that "happily and crying for joy our people marched to our Saviour's tomb, to honour it and to pay off our debt of gratitude")
Full Text: Giuliani Addresses United Nations, Oct 5 2001
ollowing is the text of an address by Mayor Rudolph Giuliani to the United Nations Monday morning, as recorded by The New York Times: MAYOR GIULIANI. Thank you, president of the General Assembly, Dr. Han Seung-soo and Secretary General Annan. And thank you very much for the opportunity to speak and also for the consideration you showed the city in putting off your general session. And as I explained to the secretary general and the president of the General Assembly, we are now open and we're ready and at any time that we can arrange it, we look forward to having your heads of state and your foreign ministers here for that session. On Sept. 11, 2001, New York City, the most diverse city in the world, was viciously attacked in an unprovoked act of war. More than 5,000 innocent men, women and children of every race, religion and ethnicity are lost. Among these were people from 80 different nations.
To their representatives here today, I offer my condolences to you as well on behalf of all New Yorkers who share this loss with you. This was the deadliest attack - terrorist attack - in history. It claimed more lives than Pearl Harbor or D-Day. This was not just an attack on the city of New York or on the United States of America. It was an attack on the very idea of a free, inclusive and civil society. It was a direct assault on the founding principles of the United Nations itself. The preamble to the U.N. Charter states that this organization exists to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, to practice tolerance and live together in peace as good neighbors and to unite our strength to maintain international peace and security. Indeed, this vicious attack places in jeopardy the whole purpose of the United Nations.
Terrorism is based on the persistent and deliberate violation of fundamental human rights. With bullets and bombs and now with hijacked airplanes, terrorists deny the dignity of human life. Terrorism preys particularly on cultures and communities that practice openness and tolerance. Their targeting of innocent civilians mocks the efforts of those who seek to live together in peace as neighbors. It defies the very notion of being a neighbor. This massive attack was intended to break our spirit. It has not done that. It's made us stronger, more determined and more resolved. The bravery of our firefighters, our police officers, our emergency workers and civilians we may never learn of, in saving over 25,000 lives that day, and carrying out the most effective rescue operation in our history, inspires all of us. I'm very honoured to have with me as their representatives the fire commissioner of New York City, Tom Von Essen. Tom, please stand up. And the police commissioner of New York City, Bernard Kerik. The determination, resolve and leadership of President George W. Bush has unified America and all decent men and women around the world. And the response of many of your nations, your leaders and people, spontaneously demonstrating, in the days after the attack, your support for New York and America and your understanding of what needs to be done to remove the threat of terrorism gives us great hope that we will prevail.
The strength of America's response, please understand, flows from the principles upon which we stand. Americans are not a single ethnic group. Americans are not of one race or one religion. Americans emerge from all of your nations. We're defined as Americans by our beliefs, not by our ethnic origins, our race or our religion. Our belief in religious freedom, political freedom, economic freedom - that's what makes an American. Our belief in democracy, the rule of law and respect for human life. That's how you become an American.
It's these very principles and the opportunities these principles give to so many to create a better life for themselves and their families that make America and New York a shining city on a hill. There's no nation in the history of the world, and no city that has seen more immigrants in less time than America. And people continue to come here in large large numbers to seek freedom, opportunity, decency, civility. Each of your nations, I'm certain, has contributed citizens to the United States and to New York. I believe I can take every one of you someplace in New York City and you can find someone from your country, someone from your village or town, that speaks your language and practices your religion. In each of your lands, there are many who are Americans in spirit by virtue of their commitment to our shared principles. It's tragic and perverse that it's because of these very principles, particularly our religious, political and economic freedoms, that we find ourselves under attack by terrorists.
Our freedom threatens them because they know if our ideas of freedom gain a foothold among their people, it will destroy their power. So they strike out against us to keep those ideas from reaching their people. The best long-term deterrent and approach to terrorism, obviously, is the spread of the principles of freedom and democracy and the rule of law and respect for human life. The more that spreads around the globe, the safer we will all be. These are very very powerful ideas and once they gain a foothold, they cannot be stopped. In fact, the rise that we've seen in terrorism and terrorist groups I believe is in no small measure a response to the spread of these ideas - freedom and democracy - to many nations, particularly over the past 15 years.
The terrorists have no ideas or ideals with which to combat freedom and democracy. So their only defense is to strike out against innocent civilians, destroying human life in massive numbers and hoping to deter all of us from our pursuit and expansion of freedom. But the long-term deterrent of spreading our ideals throughout the world is just not enough. And may never be realized if we do not act and act together, to remove the clear and present danger posed by terrorism and terrorists. The United Nations must hold accountable any country that supports or condones terrorism.
Otherwise, you will fail in your primary mission as peacekeeper. It must ostracize any nation that supports terrorism. It must isolate any nation that remains neutral in the fight against terrorism. Now is the time in the words of your charter, the United Nations Charter, to unite our strength to maintain international peace and security. This is not a time for further study or vague directives. The evidence of terrorism's brutality and inhumanity, of its contempt for life and the concept of peace is lying beneath the rubble of the World Trade Center less than two miles from where we meet today.
Look at that destruction, that massive, senseless, cruel loss of human life and then I ask you to look in your hearts and recognize that there is no room for neutrality on the issue of terrorism. You're either with civilization or with terrorists. On one side is democracy, the rule of law and respect for human life. On the other is tyranny, arbitrary executions and mass murder. We are right and they are wrong. It's as simple as that. And by that I mean that America and its allies are right about democracy, about religious, political and economic freedom. And the terrorists are wrong, and in fact evil, in their mass destruction of human life in the name of addressing alleged injustices. Let those who say that we must understand the reasons for terrorism come with me to the thousands of funerals we're having in New York City - thousands -and explain those insane maniacal reasons to the children who will grow up without fathers and mothers and to the parents who have had their children ripped from them for no reason at all.
Instead, I ask each of you to allow me to say at those funerals that your nation stands with America in making a solemn promise and pledge that we will achieve unconditional victory over terrorism and terrorists. There's no excuse for mass murder, just as there's no excuse for genocide. Those who practice terrorism, murdering or victimizing innocent civilians, lose any right to have their cause understood by decent people and lawful nations. On this issue - terrorism - the United Nations must draw a line. The era of moral relativism between those who practice or condone terrorism and those nations who stand up against it must end.
Moral relativism doesn't have a place in this discussion and debate. There's no moral way to sympathize with grossly immoral actions. And by so doing, and by trying to do that, unfortunately a fertile field has been created in which terrorism has grown. The best and most practical way to promote peace is to stand up to terror and intimidation. The Security Council's unanimous passage of Resolution 1373 adopting wide-ranging antiterrorism measures into the international community is a very good first step. It's necessary to establish accountability for the subsidizing of terrorism. As a former United States attorney, I am particularly encouraged that the United Nations has answered President Bush's call to cut terrorists off from their money and their funding. It's enormously important. We've done that successfully with organized crime groups in America by taking away their ability to amass large amounts of money. You take away their ability to have others carry on their functioning for them, even if they're removed, arrested, prosecuted or eliminated through war or through law enforcement. It cuts off the lifeblood of the organization. So I believe this was a very good first step. But now it's up to the member states to enforce this and other aspects of the resolution and for the United Nations to enforce these new mechanisms to take the financial base away from the terrorists. Take away their money, take away their access to money, and you reduce their ability to carry out complex mi

The Case Against Henry Kissinger, Aug 7 2001
Cyprus was not the first instance in which a perceived need to mollify China outweighed even the most minimal concern for human life elsewhere. On April 6, 1971, a cable of protest was written from the United States Consulate in what was then East Pakistan, the Bengali "wing" of the Muslim state of Pakistan, known to its restive nationalist inhabitants by the name Bangladesh. The cable's senior signatory, the consul general in Dhaka, was named Archer Blood, though it might have become known as the Blood Telegram in any case. Sent directly to Washington, its purpose was, quite simply, to denounce the complicity of the United States government in genocide. Its main section read:
Other reports, since amply vindicated, were supplied to the London Times and Sunday Times by the courageous reporter Anthony Mascarenhas and flashed around a horrified world. Rape, murder, dismemberment, and the state murder of children were employed as deliberate methods of repression and intimidation. At least 10,000 civilians were butchered in the first three days. The eventual civilian death toll has never been placed at less than half a million and has been put as high as 3 million.
Since almost all Hindu citizens were at risk by definition from Pakistani military chauvinism (not that Pakistan's Muslim co-religionists were spared), a vast movement of millions of refugees--perhaps as many as 10 million began to cross the Indian frontier. To summarize, then: first, the direct negation of a democratic election; second, the unleashing of a genocidal policy; third, the creation of a very dangerous international crisis. Within a short time, Ambassador Kenneth Keating, the ranking American diplomat in New Delhi, had added his voice to those of the dissenters. It was a time, he told Washington, when a principled stand against the authors of this aggression and atrocity would also make the best pragmatic sense. Keating, a former senator from New York, used a very suggestive phrase in his cable of March 29, 1971, calling on the administration to "PROMPTLY, PUBLICLY AND PROMINENTLY DEPLORE THIS BRUTALITY." It was "MOST IMPORTANT THESE ACTIONS BE TAKEN NOW," he warned, "PRIOR TO INEVITABLE AND IMMINENT EMERGENCE OF HORRIBLE TRUTHS."
Limit of 25 files exceeded. Check the search options.
1

Summary for query "Muslim":
WebGlimpse search found 160 matches in 25 files(Some matches may be to HTML tags which may not be shown.)

Islam:
Islam is an Arabic word meaning "pious submission to the will of God." It is used as the name of the religion of the orthodox Mohammedans (also called Moslems or Muslims) the name given to it by the prophet Mohammed (570-632) himself. The Mohammedans religion is therefore generally known as Islam and the Mohammedans, Muslim or Muslim is used for one who professes this religion. Islam and its adherents claim that it is a divinely revealed religion given to the world by Mahomet, also called Mohammed, who was the last of a succession of inspired prophets. Its doctrine and practices are to be found in the Book of God, the Quran (Qur'an) or Koran, the sacred writings of Islam revealed by God to the prophet Mohammed during his life at Mecca and Medina. The Five Pillars of Islam

"There is no God but God, and Mohammed is the Prophet of God."
The aspect of Islam that represents its "Faith" can be summarised thus:
Belief in the Prophets sent by God to guide mankind to the Truth
Belief in all the messages sent down by God to mankind by way of His prophets
Belief in God's angels
God alone rules the Universe without any consorts or associates. Belief in the Prophets sent by God to guide mankind to the Truth
Prophets although pious God-fearing men, were nevertheless mortal and are in no way divine. Islam started with Adam and continued through many prophets, most notably Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and lastly, and finally, Mohammed. Belief in all the messages sent down by God to mankind by way of His prophets
Belief in God's angels
God created spiritual creatures created out of light called angels, who have the inherent characteristic of total-obedience to God and cannot disobey God, ever. One of the most well known angels is Gabriel who revealed God's message to, among others, Jesus and Mohammed.
Natural moral order, the universal order of things decreed by God, is recognised in the Koran, since it tells us that God vouchsafed knowledge to his prophets that He has created a purpose for everything. Islam can thus be conveniently divided under two heads of "Faith," or "Iman," and "Practical Religion," or "Din."
These Articles of Faith and the so-called Five Pillars of Islam are incumbent on all believers in God and can be found in the Book of God, the Quran (Qur'an) or Koran, the sacred writings of Islam and in the words and actions of the Prophet Mohammed. Moreover, anyone expecting to enter Paradise must to follow the strictures Islam. God in His Infinite Wisdom has gifted mankind a most perfect manual of instruction in this most important of matters: His Holy Book, the Koran described in great detail to Mohammed, His last and most exalted messenger to mankind. That the beliefs and behaviour expected of mankind is contained in God's Own Words, the Koran, and in the words and actions of his Prophet Mohammed, called the Ahadeeth (Hadith) and Sunna (Sunnah): Ahadeeth, "sayings," and Sunna, "way of life." According to Islam, its adherents and apologists, it is God's true religion contained in the written text called the Koran and the Prophet Mohammed's Ahadeeth/Sunna (Words and Actions). According to Islam, its adherents and apologists, the religion centres its entire belief system on the Greatness of God, the Creator and Sustainer of all things. Moreover, that Islam is the only world religion whose name is not attributed to a human, such as Christianity (Jesus Christ), Buddhism (Buddha) and so on, but rather does not take its name from anyone. Rather, it is a name that God Himself has chosen for mankind meaning that man's religion should be "a submission to God." That is why his religion is called "Islam" meaning "submission." Moreover, these very same people tell us that the Koran, or Quran, is the only Holy Book in existence today, which speaks of and defines a religion called Islam. Furthermore, that in this Holy Book, Islam is described as the ultimate religion for mankind regardless of tribe, race or nationality. According to Islam, its adherents and apologists, the Koran details that God taught Islam to the Prophet Adam, the father of mankind, and that all the prophets after him, such as Noah, Abraham, Lot, and Moses, taught Islam to their people. Even Jesus Christ, who in the Islamic conception is merely regarded as a Great Prophet born of the miraculous Virgin-birth and not the Son of God, was sent specifically to the Children of Israel to teach them the true meaning of God's religion. That is, Christ taught Islam before Mohammed and was a sort of John the Baptist to Mohammed, so to speak. Thus, the adherents and apologists of Islam tell us that after Jesus, God decided to send a final messenger to establish and forever maintain His religion on Earth and so sent His last Prophet, Mohammed. Moreover, God in His great wisdom decided to give Mohammed a Holy Book containing His Spoken Words, to help teach all of mankind how to best worship and love God. The adherents and apologists of Islam point out that this Holy Book, the Koran, clearly and repeatedly states that it is the absolute and only true Word of God. Furthermore, as well as the unquestioned acceptance of the Koran as the Word of God, the acceptance of all of God's Prophets, from Adam to Mohammed, is also a requisite a requirement in Islam. Over a billion people call themselves Muslim. They believe that the only god is their god who they call Allah who they regard as the Supreme Being, the perfect, omnipotent, and omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, and Mohammed was his Prophet. Mohammed, "the Praised One," the prophet of Islam and the founder of Mohammedanism, was born in the nation of Arabia at Mecca in AD 570. This expedition, the so-called "Raid of the Elephant," seems to be of great importance for explaining the spectacular rise of Islam. The Koran in several verses tells of the miracle whereby Allah repelled the "People of the Elephant." The Koran tells us that Allah found the Prophet an orphan, poor and astray. The conduct of the Meccans toward Mohammed, for instance, were merely echoes of actions of earlier peoples toward the messengers and prophets sent to mankind, from time to time, by Allah. It is essential for Muslims to believe that Ishmael and hence Mohammed, through an unidentified line, was the inheritor of Abrahamic Covenant of "God's Chosen People." Islam tradition insists that Mohammed was an ordinary man. Islamic scholars and its adherents claim that Mohammed from the first formulated a definite notion of his work, proclaiming it to be the restoration of the religion of Abraham, or, as the Koran calls him, Ibrahim. Adherents and apologists of Islam point out stories relating to precursors of Mohammed going abroad in search of the "religion of Abraham." Apocryphal stories helped engender this supposed affiliation between Islam, Judaism and Christianity. In the Koran, Jesus is called a prophet and Mary is praised.
An attitude that changed completely after he gained religious strength and political power. For, inevitably, Mohammed's followers soon found that Christian and Jewish teachings contradicted the Koran, but since "God is one," and Mohammed his Prophet infallible, they reasoned that Jews and Christians must have misunderstood God's word.
Moreover, these followers were a veritable secret society. The Islamic doctrines and practices from the first attacked the ancient Arab heathenism and the doctrines to which the Prophet himself assigned most value were the unity of God and the future life, or resurrection of the body. Moreover, some of them were devoted adherents of the gods or goddesses whom he attacked. The move to military means to spread Islamic doctrines rapidly brought success and Mohammed's fanatical army conquered several Arabian, Jewish and Christian tribes. There are five important points to make about Allah, Mohammed's god and the supernatural object of veneration in the Koran.
This "Allah" can be traced back to "Il" and "Ilah" and from there to the ancient Moon-God of the Arabian peoples.
Under Mohammed's tutelage, the relatively anonymous "Ilah," became "Al-Ilah," "The God," or "Allah," the Supreme Being.
Mohammed equated his "Allah" with Yahweh of the Bible, the god of Abraham.
Thus, the source of "Allah" goes back to pre-Muslim times, to "Il" and from there back to the Moon-God. Moreover, that "Allah" is not a common name meaning "God" (or a "god") and Muslims must use another word or form if he wishes to indicate any other than his own peculiar deity. In short, the god of the Koran is not the God of the Bible. The moon god Allah is not the same as the Gods of the Bible who were first, Yahweh, and second, Christ, who replaced Yahweh in a process are called "The Disappearance of Yahweh." For, God does not play dice with His Creation.
The Babylonian "ilu" and the Arabic "Allah" also represent this ancient common term for a pre-eminent god. Eloah's Arabic cognomen is "Allah." The rise of Allah in Arabia and the spectacular spread across the known world of his spirituality was not fortuitous but divinely ordained. It was mandate by Divine Powers that Islam was to become a most potent weapon by which other spiritual streams that threatened Natural Moral Order were smothered and thereby attenuating their threat. Islam is the latest of the so-called world-religions. It grew up amongst two, Judaism and Christianity, which were practised in Arabia at the time of Mohammed. It is obvious from Islamic scripture that the Prophet of Allah, but especially his immediate followers, arrogated some of the doctrines and practices of Islam from these. A convenient assertion made by Muslims, especially those who wish to conceal Islam's true nature, is that the God of the Bible is Allah by a different name. Consequently, there has been a modern tendency of using the name "God" in place of "Allah" in many translations of the Koran. Again an attempt to make Islam compatible with Western sensibilities. However, the true nature of Islam is discerned from the revealed word of Allah and from the words and deeds of his Prophet. (Surah 29:46). "Fight those who believe not in God nor the last day ... Nor acknowledge the religion of truth [Islam], [even if they are] of the people of the Book [Christians and Jews], until they pay Jizya [tribute tax] with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued". (Surah 9:29).
The God of the Bible is not the god of Islam yet the two are linked because they both belong to godhead. Islam's origins are traced back to the ancient fertility religion of the worship of the moon god, which was always the dominant religion of Arabia. In short, the central observances of Islam were pagan rites practised by the Arabs long before Mohammed was born. The nature of godhead is more complex than that elaborated by orthodox Christianity and Islam. Moreover that the Divine Powers brought the ferocious, fanaticism of Islam into being for a very definite purpose. One must understand that the spectacular rise of Islam and the creation of the Islamic Empire were not the issue of chance occurrence or fortuitous events. For reader, God does not play dice with His Creation ……….
The Koran, or Quran, is said to be the sacred writings of Islam revealed by God to the prophet Mohammed during his life at Mecca and Medina presented in 114 chapters, or "suras." Mohammed proclaimed the Koran as the miracle that proved his oracular function and the great evidence that supported his claim to be the final word on the matter of God's revealed Word. Moreover, Islam not only claims that the Koran is God's Word, but also that it is the final revelation given to humanity. Muslims maintain that the Koran is an exact copy, word-for-word, of God's final revelation that is found on the original heavenly tablets. The language of the Koran is universally acknowledged throughout Islam to be the perfect form of Arab speech. The evidence suggests that the Koran was an evolved text rather than simply the Word of God as revealed in its entirety to the Prophet Mohammed in the seventh century. Others find it disturbing fearing, with good reason, what might be revealed other than God's revealed Word. Furthermore, ideally, though not always in reality, Islamic history has been the grand effort to pursue and work out the commandments of the Koran in human life. In short, the Sana'a manuscripts and other evidence present considerable problems for the traditional Muslim account of the history of Islam. Moreover, that Mecca was not the initial Islamic sanctuary and that evidence points to a sanctuary in northwest Arabia as the centre of Islam with Mecca secondary. Furthermore, that the spectacular Arab conquests preceded the institutionalisation of Islam. Puin's opinion on the Koran's history is:
Even within the Islamic traditions there is a huge body of contradictory information, including a significant Christian substrate; one can derive a whole Islamic anti-history from them if one wants."
Today, Muslim apologists face a serious threat from Western Koranic scholarship. That is, secular scholars of Islam (known as "Orientalists") whose researches put into serious doubt many of the assertions made by traditional Muslim scholars concerning their holy book, the Koran, and their prophet, Mohammed. Consequently, the formative stage of Islam was not within the lifetime of Mohammed but evolved over a period of 200-300 years after the Prophets death. Before 750, AD there is no extant Muslim documents that provide information about this formative period of Islam. More damagingly for the traditional Islamic position, nothing exists with which to corroborate Muslim tradition, that is, Islamic history based on Islamic traditions. Around 800 AD, when the Koran became codified, can therefore be regarded as the classical period of Islam. The devout Muslim, be he a redactor of the Koran or chronicler of Islam viewed their Prophet with such reverence that criticism was wholly absent. According to orthodox Muslim scholars, Islam gives complete credence to divine intervention for its revelation.
Muslim tradition asserts that Mohammed received revelations from Allah via the angel Gabriel (Jibril) over a period of twenty-two years (610-632 AD), in which time most of the laws and traditions were formulated and worked out, which distinguish that which we define as Islam.
Thus, Muslim tradition asserts that Islam was given once and only to Mohammed who in a short period, with the help several remarkable followers, brought about in the early seventh century a religion of immense sophistication, of intricate laws and traditions.
Muslims contend that we can only understand the origins of the Koran through the eyes of Muslim tradition, which tells us that Allah revealed his truth through the Koran which was sent down to Mohammed. In short, that on its pages is the Word of God. Muslims also contend that the Koran itself is a source for Islam, and its own best authority. In short, modern treatment of the Muslim tradition and the Koran by Orientalists using literary criticism and modern scientific techniques of analysis leaves the Muslim faithful and Islamic apologist with little on which to hold. Unfortunately for the people of the world everything is going according to the New World Order Plan. But what is this New World Order Plan? The dark agenda of the secret planners of the New World Order is to impose upon the world a global feudal –fascist state with a World Government, World Religion, World Army, World Central Bank, World Currency and a micro-chipped population. Whatever else one may think about Mohammed. of Mahomet, and his creed, one thing that is indisputable about Islam is this: the rapid and victorious spread of Islam is wholly without parallel in the history of the world. For in a space of a few years the Arab hoards swept away established order and replaced it with the Islamic world conception. A breathtaking phenomenon that suggests that Islam somehow was ordained for this purpose of shattering nations. Even human wrath, unknowing serves that all-controlling will; Man proposes; God disposes; All things His design fulfill. For, gentle reader, God does not play dice with His Creation.
The Prophet Mohammed established Islam with a minimum of innovations, employing the hallowed personages, historic legends and sacred sites of Judaism, Christianity and Arab paganism, by Islamizing them. Many Biblical legends ("asatir al-awwalin"), familiar to the pagan Arabs before the advent of Islam suffered an Islamic conversion, and, consequently, the Koran as well as the Ahadeeth (the Islamic oral tradition) is replete with them. A strange fact given that Muslims now regard it as the third most treasured city in Islam. It is thus a seeming quirk of history that Islam now arrogates spiritual control of Jerusalem in direct conflict with the other religions that also claim this: Judaism and Christianity. Moreover, that the religion of Mohammed would today, at this most sensitive of times, be the mortal foe of Christianity and the West and regard Jerusalem as a most holy place that is Islam's by divine right, thereby bringing the three monotheist religions into terrible conflict. (Surah 17:1).
Moreover, that Islam regards Jerusalem as a most holy place that is it's by divine right, thereby bringing the three monotheist religions into terrible conflict. For, gentle reader, God does not play dice with His Creation.
Jihad is a word that contains within it the concept of the holy struggle by Muslims to bring the entire world under Islam. "Jihad" is an Arabic word which means "struggle" and in this sense it is the struggle for the cause of the world ambition of Islam, using all means available to Muslims, including violence. Used in this manner, Jihad is often referred to as "Holy War." In the Ahadeeth, we read that Mohammed frequently urges Muslims to practice Jihad. For instance, Mohammed once was asked what was the best deed for the Muslims next to believing in Allah and his Apostle, the Prophet, the Apostle Mohammed answered: "To participate in Jihad in Allah's cause." (Al Bukhari vol. 1:25) Mohammed was quoted by Al Bukhari as saying: "I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, none has the right to be worshipped but Allah" (Al Bukhari vol. 4:196). Furthermore, we read that Mohammed also said:
(Al Bukhari vol. 1:35).
Surah 9, verse 5 of the Koran reads:
(Surah 8:60)
(Surah 9:14)
(Surah 8:13-17)
(Surah 9:123)
"… fight People of the Book [Christians and Jews], who do not accept the religion of the truth [Islam], until they pay tribute [penalty tax] by hand, being inferior." A constant state of war exists between the two until such time the non-Muslims convert to Islam. In other words, Muslims can never peacefully co-exist with non-Muslims until a Muslim World Empire exists on this Earth. Islam does. Even in Mohammed's time, the striving for world Islamic Empire took the form of total war and extreme violence against non-believers who refused to submit to the will of Allah. During Mohammed's lifetime, there were frequent clashes with Christians and Jews. In March 632, Mohammed completed the revelation of God's message during a "Farewell Pilgrimage" to Mecca, on the plain of Arafat outside the city, where he announced God's words:
"God has made inviolable for you each other's blood."
By this decree, Mohammed meant that Muslim was not to fight Muslim. Contemporary apologists of Islam attempt to portray the bloody history of the Mohammedan creed in anodyne fantasies wholly at odds with its true nature or proper history. Wahhabism is a Mohammedan sect founded by Mohammed ibn 'Abdul-Wahhab (1703-1792) who instituted a great reform in the religion of Islam in Arabia in the 18th century. As a reform movement, Wahhabism therefore sought to eliminate non-Muslim elements, which had become popular over the centuries and corrupted Islam. However, the second goal was to return Islam to the purity of its roots since contemporary Muslims had been ignoring Islamic obligations. In this context, Abdul Wahhabi was one of the first to use the term "Jahiliyya", the barbarous state of Arabia before the advent of Islam, before Mohammed received his revelation from God and brought Islam to the world. Abdul Wahhabi thus used the term to illustrate the great benefits of the pure spirit of Islam when applied to ostensibly Islamic lands and thereby justifying the use of force to make fundamental changes to bring about this perfect society. Abdul Wahhabi claimed that the majority of Muslims lived in jahiliyya, and accused them of not being Muslims proper. Reform movements that attempted to reinterpret aspects of Islamic law in order to bring it closer to secular standards arising from the West, particularly with regards to matters like gender relations, family law, and democratic government.
Mohammed ibn 'Abdul-Wahhab and all his followers were Hanbali. What distinguished the movement from the "traditional" Islamic schools was the revolutionary zeal and ferocious nature since the adherents sought to rekindle Islam's pristine original nature. Abdul-Wahhab believed, like all Muslims, that the most important principle in Islam is the unity of God but unlike other Muslims, he did something about it. Furthermore, Abdul-Wahhab believed in unifying all Muslims under a single state- this is the reawakening of the Islamic world ambition. As in all puritanical movements, the supporters of Mohammed ibn 'Abdul-Wahhab were pious and strict, especially in matters of worship and their movement inspired other reform movements across the Muslim world. This dichotomy, the "liberal" and "conservative" perspectives of the Koran and Sunna, also appears in Shia Islam. Apologists of Islam, especially Saudi officials, argue that Wahhabism is a term now used by the enemies of the religion to demonise it further in the eyes of the West. Moreover, that the purpose of this attack on Islam is to be found in the desire of certain groups to convince the world that the conflict in the Middle East has nothing to do "with a quarrel over a bit of land in the Middle East." To recreate the pristine, ferocious and unforgiving nature of original Islam by sloughing off the later accretions that most people regard as "traditional" Islam and return to the pure roots of their faith. A faith that has at its core a ruthless, merciless ambition to create an Islamic World Empire that contains no other religion but that of Allah. It is a Muslim sect founded by Mohammed ibn 'Abdul-Wahhab who instituted a great reform in the religion of Islam in Arabia in the eighteenth century.
It sought to overthrow the abuses and corruptions of Islam, which had overgrown the practice of original religion instituted by the Prophet Mohammed, that is, to return Islam to the purity of its roots.
It is a reform movement that sought to eliminate non-Muslim elements, which had become popular over the centuries and had corrupted Islam: that is, to destroy "traditional" Islam and resurrect the pristine, original form of Islam.
Its doctrines were extended by force and imposed by the sword just as had the original Islam instituted by Mohammed.
It rejects any reinterpretation of the fundamentals of Islam contained in the Koran and Sunna.
Unification of all Muslims under a single state and the elimination of non-Muslim nations: that is, the reawakening of the Islamic world ambition.
Associated with Wahhabism is the fundamentalist movement arising from a school in medieval Islam known as the Salafiyya. Some early Salafis argued that Western democracy was perfectly compatible with Islam, and had even been anticipated by the Islamic concept of "shura," a consultation between ruler and ruled. The early optimism faded after the Great War, when the Western powers carved up the Ottoman Empire, created by the Ottoman Turks in the 13th century, into nation-states. A crucial time was in the 1930's, when Muslim radicals began to argue that Islam was in real danger of being extinguished through Western influence. Qutb soon rejected democracy and nationalism as decadent Western ideas incompatible with Islam. Even the tremendously popular concept of pan-Arabism in the Arab world, Qutb deemed simply an obstacle to the foundation of an Islamic state. Qutb simply argued that the contemporary rulers of the Muslim world are no longer Muslims that they were in effect infidels. Such a declaration was an audacious move since Islamic tradition states that if one Muslim falsely calls another an infidel the accuser could burn in hell. Ibn Taimiyya is a towering figure in the history of Muslim thought and lived in Damascus in a period when the Mongols threatened Syria. The document was addressed to other Muslims rather than to the West and provided reasoned argument why assassination of leaders and rebellion, which is forbidden by most Islamic authorities, becomes a duty if those rulers have abandoned true Islam.
When Saudi princes from various tribes were placed on the thrones of the artificially created states of Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Gulf States, Syria, Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon. It is therefore a most salient feature of Islam that, with a few notable exceptions, no secular republic, let alone popular rule through institutionalised constitutional government, has ever prevailed or existed anywhere long in the Muslim world. The Muslim world is thus characterised by autocrats, despots and militarism, chasms between rulers and ruled, huge gulfs between elites and the masses and the absence of the notions of universal human rights. Even the trade and practice of slavery, in which the Muslim excelled, was only officially relinquished after the liberal democratic powers Great Britain and the US declared war on it in the 19th century. Apart from these few places the rest of the Muslim world is, and always has been, ruled with an iron fist.
Not all religious or political martyrs are Muslim fanatics, the Japanese kamikaze pilots in the Second World War and the Tamils in Sri Lanka are notable examples. Islam on the other hand advocates the use of all forms of violence to achieve its ultimate aim: the establishment of a Muslim World Empire. The true nature of Islam is ferocious and its ultimate ambition is the destruction of all other religions and political systems and the establishment of the rule of Islam across the globe. Who similarly argue that terrorist attacks such as that of 11 September 2001 on the World Trade Center are simply not compatible with orthodox Muslim theology, citing the Koran as source on this matter. That the holy book of Islam cautions soldiers '"in the way of Allah" to fight their enemies face-to-face, without harming non-combatants, women or children. Moreover, that most Muslims around the world, especially those when in the minority, are clearly law-abiding citizens of their host countries. Islam in its pristine state was violent, intolerant, and it followers fanatical beyond measure and Wahhabism is simply the modern revival of this ancient creed.
First, that the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful people who would prefer the establishment of Western democracy in their own countries. Moreover, that this Wahhabism is subsidised by Saudi Arabia. A Muslim country and hotbed of Wahhabism that affects friendship with the West while at the same time spreading Wahhabi ideology everywhere Muslims are to be found. In short, the Saudis have played a double game for years, just as the evil and very wicked Joseph Stalin did with the West during the Second World War. In conclusion, what should be understood about Islam is this. Nothing in history occurs by accident. Divine Powers initiated Islam for a very definite purpose and to achieve this, then nature of Islam was required to be ferocious and unforgiving. The consequence of the inherent nature of Islam was the spectacular successes of the Arab armies and the creation of the Muslim Empire in the seventh and eight centuries. Moreover, that unforgiving Islam became attenuated in the subsequent centuries even finding itself amenable to Western influences. Furthermore, that the radical reform movements such as Salafiyya and Wahhabism are appeals to the Muslim world return to the original nature of Islam and not perversions of it, as so many apologists and mealy-mouthed journalists and politicians have expressed. What is called today in the liberal media and elsewhere as "perversions of Islam" are in effect merely reassertions of Islamic founding principles. 'O God, destroy the Jews and their supporters. Sheikh Akram Abd-al-Razzaq al-Ruqayhi, preaching in the Grand Mosque in Sanaa broadcast live on Yemeni state TV (9 August 2002).
'O God, destroy the usurper Jews and the vile Christians.'
The recent trend in the controlled and corrupt Western media and elsewhere is to whitewash the negative and violent image of Islam in the West and to emphasise it as a religion of peace. Especially since the World Trade Center attack, there has been a flood of statements and articles making these assertions. Moreover, we are often told that the word Islam means "peace" when in truth it Islam actually means "submission" rather different from "peace." Furthermore, the contradictory reactions to the Islamic terrorist attacks, official condemnation at leadership level and widespread support amongst the ordinary Muslim masses, are a stark indication that Islam is not always "a religion of peace". The wholesale rejoicing in the Muslim world at the tragic loss of American lives and the humiliation of the American government cannot be dismissed as "a few extremists." A central belief in the Muslim faith is that the Koran the very word of God, is immutable, applying to all people, in all times, in all places. The Koran is the source of the Muslim faith and the law that orders the Islamic culture and society. For if it where then the ferocious and unforgiving nature of Islam would never have developed and its spectacular rise to world power through conquest would never have occurred. The development of Shariah, the Islamic law that underpins the Muslim world, created a society where non-Muslims lived as second-class citizens subject to and humiliated by numerous laws. The Koran speaks of this enduring enmity between Muslims and non-Moslems:
(Surah 5, verse 85).
Islamic terrorist atrocities cannot be dismissed as merely the work of a small group of Wahhabi extremists considering the mass appeal of the humbling of the US by acts of terror has throughout the Muslim world. Thus, the many Muslims that celebrate every act of terror against America doubtless recall the words of the Koran, urging Muslims to:
"... fight a mighty nation, fight them until they embrace Islam."
Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohamed, leader of the radical Islamic organisation Al-Muhajiroun, that works to bring Britain under the rule of Islam, has indicated that civilian targets are wrong, but military and government targets are legitimate. Citizens vote, it argued, for the government and pay taxes to support it. The Koran contains many exhortations to violence in defence of Islam, for instance:
(Surah 9, verse 5).
The sixth pillar of Islam, which has developed over 1,400 years in many political settings, is "jihad," a word in the Koran that means personal "effort" to improve or to wage war against aggressors. Thus, "Jihad" means a just war in response to aggression; Islamic terrorist acts would not qualify as "jihad," since in Islamic law, "jihad" can only come from a consensus. Since Islam has no central earthly authority or council, which has led to much disagreement or flexibility on what the Koran demands or Allah expects.
Apologists also argue that a millennium ago Muslim political forces determined that Islam would reject a rational element that could have helped it cope with modernity. Many apologists argue that social frustration, suppression and alienation more than doctrine has produced the modern violence in Islam, though on the grounds of doctrinal purity, jihad often has been waged by Muslim against Muslim. The only true faith in God's sight is Islam (Surah 3:19).
There are passages in which the faithful are exhorted to leave their homes and fight for Islam, if necessary slaying unbelievers and those who worship false gods (Surah 8:39, 9:5, 9:123).
"First the Saturday People; then the Sunday People"
Muslim maxim for Jihad against the world but especially the Jew and the Christian
Apologists of Islam argue that in no sense are terrorist atrocities such as the assassination of Anwar Sadat, the murder of tourists at Luxor, the Muslim killers of Christians around the world or the World Trade Centre bombers representatives of Islam. Moreover, they point out that neither Osama bin Laden or his principal associate, Ayman al-Zawahiri, are graduates of Islamic universities or seminaries and their proclamations ignore 14 centuries of Muslim scholarship. The occupation by Zionist Israel of Muslim holy sites in Jerusalem has unquestionably contributed to terrible and precarious state of affairs in the world but especially in the Middle East. The hatred of the Muslim masses for Israeli policy, and thus for the United States, is now unbounded. Western policy in support of Zionist ambitions is a major source of Muslim fury that fuels Islamic fundamentalism.
Decadent contemporary Islam deems Wahhabism as heretical. Apologists of decadent contemporary Islam call this attenuated form of Islam "traditional Islam" since they can cite over a thousand years of examples in which Islamic history illustrates extraordinary feats of toleration and Muslim lands as havens for diverse religions and sects. Salafiyya and Wahhabism are attempts to rekindle the original ferocious spirit of Islam and bring about the Islamic World Empire. Another result of this rejection of "traditional Islam" i.e. the decadent contemporary Islam not the original form of it, claim the apologists has been the notion that political power should be in the hands of men of religion. A radical departure from the norm of Islam that mainstream Islamic scholarship regards it with deep suspicion. Moreover, mainstream Islamic theologians have come out unanimously against the terrorists and it is incumbent upon these leaders of the Islamic world to refute the aberrant doctrines that underpin terrorism theologically.
Dishonest or poorly informed liberals or, more commonly, poorly informed dishonest liberals, argue that that the idea that Islam as intrinsically hostile to Western democracy is precisely the position of those who carry out Islamic terrorism. For, many of the Arab states most hostile to Western interests are secular (e.g. Iraq, Syria, Libya), while some the West's strongest Muslim friends are mildly theocratic (e.g. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates). Positing some kind of culture-clash between the religions is not only insulting to those Muslim states that loathe Islamic fundamentalism (e.g. the Taliban) but also contributes to the alienation of millions of Muslims resident in the West. Moreover, although the natural unease in the world around them of the Muslim living in the West need not compromise a Moslem's loyalty as a citizen. That during the so-called Dark Ages, Islamic scholars preserved the knowledge of the ancients that Christendom was disposed to forget. Furthermore, that because Islam had no real hierarchy and that the faithful were encouraged to develop a direct relationship with God, the Islam is closer to the values of the Enlightenment than Roman Catholic Christianity. The apologists of Islam fail to point out that the current religious revival in Muslim countries has not been accompanied by any equivalent intellectual or cultural renaissance. That is, modern textual scholarship of the Koran (as honest Muslim scholars themselves will admit) has become retarded in some of the great centres of Muslim learning. Moreover, that the corrupt despotisms that rule so much of the Middle East make a mockery of the Muslim claim to establish social justice. A state of affairs that is the cause of the rage that all drives the Islamic fundamentalists.
Muslim- Imam Ahmed.
Allah's prophet Mohammed.
The Islam tenets of "Faith," or "Iman," and "Practical Religion," or "Din:" the so-called Five Pillars and Articles of Faith
Jihad is the Sixth Pillar of Islam. Jihad or "Holy War" is one of many sacred duties "good" Muslims are obliged to perform. Allah repeatedly described the difference between a "good" and "bad" Muslim. Allah hates a "bad" Muslim, the peaceful Muslim who does not do Jihad, but Allah loves a "good" Muslim who leaves home to carry out Jihad: to convert, kill or tax to extinction non-Muslims.
The Arrogation of the Abrahamic Covenant, or "The Promise" that legitimises the claim that the Muslims are via Mohammed the "Chosen People of God" and not the Israelites or the Judeans.
The decree that Muslim was not to fight Muslim.
Muslims can never peacefully co-exist with non- Muslims due to the division of the world into two warring factions: the Muslims or the "Dar al Islam" (The abode of Islam) and non- Muslims or the "Dar al Harb" (The abode of war).
Islam does.
Jerusalem is the third most holy city in Islam and Muslims claim that it should be under control of Islam.
The pristine, original form of Islam is ferocious, merciless and unforgiving; otherwise its spectacular success would never have happened in so short a time.
"Traditional" Islam is in fact an amalgam of distortions that constitute abuses and corruptions of pure, pristine Islam.
Radical Muslim sects such as Wahhabism and Salafiyya sought to overthrow the abuses and corruptions of "traditional" Islam. Wahhabism and Salafiyya advocate that Islamic doctrines are extended by force and imposed by the sword just as had original Islam instituted by Mohammed.
Wahhabism and Salafiyya advocate the unification of all Muslims under a single state and the elimination of non-Muslim nations: that is, the reawakening of the Islamic world ambition and the wish to create a Muslim World Empire in which Islam reigns supreme.
Wahhabism is the official ideology of Saudi Arabia who nurtures its creed inside its own borders but also sends out Wahhabi clerics to wherever Muslims are found in the world.
The so-called "rogue states" [Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Libya, etc.] are less important in the radicalisation of Islam than Saudi Arabia, which is the single most important sponsor and supporter of the radicalisation of Islam. Thus, if the West wants to do something about radical Islam or Islamic extremism it has to deal with Saudi Arabia. In short, anti-terror experts and politicians in the West must consider the Saudi connection in all major Muslim outrages against Western targets.
Mohammed invoked Allah's name to encourage his followers to murder those who did not submit to his claims. Yet today, apologists of Islam and Western Muslims claim that Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance. This was not the Islam of Mohammed.
The political doctrine of Islam is FEAR.
Barbaric, horrific Muslim terrorist attacks personified by the terrifying spectacle of the "suicide bomber" cause great unease and confusion in the West. Although these terrorists and murderers are deemed Muslims, this does not mean that every Muslim is a terrorist. While politicians, many news commentators and talking heads proclaim that Islam is a peace-loving religion, others warn of Islamic Jihad, or Holy War. These conflicting descriptions of Islam can be explained by examining:
"Wealth and children are the adornment of the life of this world" (Surat Al-Kahf 18:46).
It is therefore not surprising to find that Islam, in large measure a product of Mohammed's psyche, is similarly a complex faith. Muslim clerics cynically use Koranic verses, including those kind to Jews and Christians, to paint a scenario in which Islam is depicted as a religion of peace, brotherhood, modesty, morality, self-discipline and family values. In truth, the true face of Islam is revealed in the Koranic verses calling "good" Muslims to "Jihad," or "holy war" against all non-Muslims to bring about the World Muslim Empire.
Fundamentalists
These Muslims want to re-establish the pristine, pure original nature of Islam by applying the extreme verses of the Koran to the letter. The Prophet Muhammad urges Muslims to fight in the cause of Allah:
"O prophet Muhammad urge the believers [Muslims] to fight" (Surat Al-Anfal 8:65). "Jihad ["holy war" in Allah's name] is ordained for you" (Surat Al-Baqarah 2:216).
The Koran commands Muslims not to befriend Jews or Christians:
The Koran commands Muslims to fight Jews and Christians:
The Koran commands Muslims to fight non-Muslims until the Muslim world ambition is achieved: the Muslim World Empire in which all other religions are extinguished and Islam reigns supreme:
Jihad or "holy war" in Allah's name must be prosecuted against those who live in the "camp of war" [Dar Al-Harb] should continue until they are exterminated. Modern Islamic fundamentalists dream of a global Islamic Empire, of making real Mohammed's desire to establish a Muslim World Empire. These Islamacists believe that if they destroy the US and the Western countries they will achieve this ancient dream.
Prominent radical Muslim clerics call suicide bombers martyrs for Islam. The Koran commands Muslims to terrorise, torture and kill anyone who disobeys Allah and his Prophet Mohammed:
That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter" (Surat Al-Maidah 5:33).
The Koran declares Allah's love of those who fight his cause:
The Koran commands Muslims to convert forcibly non-Muslims to Islam:
There are two types of Muslim Terrorist: the Secular Muslim terrorist and the Fundamentalist Muslim terrorist. Secular Muslim Terrorist
Yasser Arafat and his creature called the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) personify the Secular Muslim terrorist movement. Islamic Fundamentalist Muslim Terrorist
Radical, fundamentalist Islamic terrorists believe what Allah told Mohammed that the gates of Paradise are under the "shadows of the swords." Islamic fundamentalists know that death is the common lot of humanity. Islamic fundamentalists therefore believe that martyrdom is the highest expression of their faith in Islam. "The purest joy in Islam is to kill and be killed for Allah."
Islamic fundamentalists terrorists or Islamist groups, include the Lebanese Shiite militants of Hezbollah (which Iran helped found in the 1980s), the Kashmir Militant Extremists, the Algerian Armed Islamic Group and such Palestinian terrorist groups as Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network.
The Marxist-Socialists Muslim terrorists fear, hate and detest the Fundamentalist Muslim terrorists who reciprocate this hatred with a peculiar zealotry imbued with the ferocity of the pristine Islamic faith.
Islamic fundamentalist terrorism is distinct in two ways. Islamism rejects the modern state and its secular law in the name of a "brotherhood of Moslems" that appeals to all Muslim hearts, uniting them against the infidel. Western prosperity, Western legal systems, Western forms of banking, Western communications and Western consumerism now reaches across frontiers to affect the lives and aspirations of people all over the globe. The cohorts of this type of Islamic fundamentalism accept no territory as home, and no human law as authoritative, but commit themselves to a state of permanent exile, while concurrently resolving to carry out God's work of punishment. Western forms of banking finance that enables Osama bin Laden to conceal his wealth and to deploy it anywhere in the world. Western technology and communications al Qaeda exploits so effectively against the West. What it represents is an implacable summons to war, issued by cosmopolitan bourgeois Muslims. Attendant with this is the global export of the moral degeneracy of corrupt Western liberal democracies. Pornography in the United States is protected as free speech and people indulge this assault on human dignity as the price paid for freedoms too precious to relinquish. Globalization is a most potent means by which militant Islam can prosecute its Jihad against the world but especially the West. In fact, Globalization offers Islam the opportunity to attack Christendom that it has lacked since the Ottoman Turk retreat from central Europe. Islamic states do not have the loyalty of their people, who are not citizens but subjects and for the most part are contemptuous of their rulers, who themselves, invariably despise the Muslim masses. Modern Muslim states have not posed a threat to the West. Globalization has spawned a new phenomenon: globalised Islam, a true Islamic umma, the worldwide community of Muslims that identifies itself across borders in terms of a global form of legitimacy. Globalised Islam invokes the nostalgia of the Muslim Empire under Allah, of Jihad that forged this empire, and directs this rekindled ferocity at Allah's enemies, wherever they are.
Islamic fundamentalists... consider Spain to be an apostate country, since we were once part of the ummah [community of believers], and, in their view, 'abandoned' Islam."
For, powerful dark forces are manipulating this ancient angst and hatred for a more sinister design than merely the restoration of the grand Islamic Empire or the establishment of a World Empire under Allah.
It is the United States, conceived as a sovereign nation-state. These Islamists do not perceive the American people as the enemy but the American state, conceived as an autonomous agent acting freely on the stage of international politics. Moreover, for the crimes against Islam and the Muslim people these Islamists believe America is calling on itself the wrath of Allah. By contrast to corporate agency established by Western political systems are the other types of state of the non-Western world. The United Nations has contrived these fictions for dealing with whichever despot, clique or faction is at that time holding the peoples of these countries hostage.
The attacks were designed to wound the corporate person, the nation-state that is the United States in its decision-making part. For, the three targets, the Pentagon, the White House, and the World Trade Center represent the three principal spheres of political agency — military, governmental, and economic — and the three ways in which the United States exercises its power around the globe. To grasp the significance of what is taking place in the modern world you must understand Islamic Fundamentalism and its attendant terrorism, and the forces that are ultimately behind it. Salafiyya and Wahhabism were forces that appeared spent before the First World War but have ever since inexorably strengthened. In 1928, The Muslim Brotherhood was established by fundamentalists whose aim was to unite the Muslim world, and create an Islamic empire but which never gained a large following. A radical cleric who hated the West, but especially the United States, and who advocated strict adherence to Islamic law, and a worldwide Jihad. However, the astute chronicler of history always understands that behind the tableau of visible history there lies the hidden stream of history, in which the power moves by groups vying for power and influence are made. What the reader must understand is that within the US State Department and all other power structures within the West are elements that are inimical to the sovereign nations and organisations they claim to faithfully serve. The Globalist agenda is part of the Evil Agenda that is the Great Conspiracy against God brought to Earth. One ramification of this Evil Agenda is that human freedom is in grave danger in the rapid moves toward a unified global system, the New World Order. This shadowy group, this cabal of power, work behind the scenes through this network of powerful Globalist bodies whose collective power is immense and which, in effect, makes this group a world government in the shadows. That is, the Shadow Government of the world that plots and schemes to come out of the shadows and proclaim itself the legitimate and only representative of the whole of humanity, a veritable One World Government.
The champions of the New World Order are a cadre of powerful industrialists, bankers, academics and politicians who have been, since the end of the First World War, a grey eminence behind the governance of Britain and America. They represent what some have called the Anglo-American Establishment whose outward manifestation is the Council on Foreign Relations. More importantly, they are the true governors of the Western world. The New World Order has thus two aspects: the secular and the spiritual. The first is contained in the idea of the One World Government and the second in the idea of the One World Religion. Although certain Jews, Freemasons and Jesuits may think otherwise, the move to World Empire predicated on Evil is not a World Jewish Conspiracy, nor a Freemasonic or Jesuit World Conspiracy. Nor is it an Islamic World ambition. The real powerbrokers are the Lords of Power who serve non-human intelligences inhabiting the Cosmos that are the Evil spiritual forces that have been a constant presence in human history. The Lords of Power are the human agents of Evil and are the Occult Hierarchy who are verily the Black Adepts from the Cult of Evil that control the secret societies that really run the temporal affairs of this Earth. They are the dark spiritual warlords that control the "International Bankers," industrialists, academics and politicians through control of these occult groups and who will use these corrupt people and the United Nations as the means to form their super-government of the world- the One World Government under their sway. The Evil Powers this cult worship is hostile to mankind's spiritual freedom and has plotted for millennia to remove it from evolution. A world moreover that is rapidly descending into chaos and madness for no apparent reason. Crucial to this Great Conspiracy against God orchestrated by these Dark Powers is the need to maroon mankind on Earth cut-off from his spiritual inheritance and all knowledge of God. This is the reason behind the ascendancy of materialism and the plethora of stratagems, collectively called the Humanist Agenda, which attacks Natural Moral Order on Earth. The worship of materialism and the Humanist Agenda are the two main aspects of the Evil Agenda, which is the Great Conspiracy against God brought to Earth. Moreover, the arbiters of this Evil Agenda are the human agents of Evil, the Brotherhood of Darkness, the Occult Hierarchy who are verily the Black Adepts from the Cult of Evil. The intergenerational occultists who worship the Dark Gods, Ahriman and Lucifer and who control the temporal affairs of this world by their control of the secret societies, Freemasonry, the Jesuits, the Vatican and organised Jewry. The Black Adepts from the Cult of Evil, the Lords of Power, are the true temporal power in this world and are the Shadow Government that is truly the One World Government-in-waiting. Wars and conflicts are engineered for the effects they cause within Western society. A crucial part of this engineered conflict is the controlled clash of cultures between Christianity, Judaism and Islam. These three so-called world religions have been targeted by the Cult of Evil for their use in the final war, the Third World War that has been long planned by this Cult. Those who are privy to this plan know that three world conflagrations were planned to bring about world government under the sway of the wicked and evil men who are Lords of Power. In the coming Third World War, Christianity, Judaism (in the form of Zionism) and Islam are to be pitted against each other. The architects of the third world conflagration have planned to use Islam as the anvil on which Western society, the" Zionist Powers" but especially the republic of the United States of America, is finally smashed and its remnant willing to accept the Globalist dream. That is, breaking of the last vestiges of self-confidence, self-esteem, and the sense of independence of people to the point where they will relinquish national sovereignty, all personal freedoms and accept a One World Government predicated on tyranny. That is why the Cult of Evil and its minions had to resurrect the ancient pristine Islamic spirit, the pure Islam of Allah and his Prophet that energised the Arab armies to destroy everything that opposed it. The plan is to use Islam and so its pristine original nature had to be resurrected and this is the raison d'être of the modern phenomenon often called the Islamic fundamentalist movement. For the Cult of Evil not only created its modern form, they directly control it as well.
The long-planned goal of plutocratic global dictatorship is the raison d'être of the so-called Anglo-American Establishment: to bring the world into the Globalist New Age dream: a global feudal state. Key to this plan is the use of Islam, especially the ancient form of this religion that once made the Arab army the most feared in the world. That is why this group of wicked and evil men has carefully nurtured Islamic fundamentalism and terrorism. Thus, we find the headquarters of Islamic terrorism not in Baghdad, Mecca or Islamabad but in London, where the Anglo-American Establishment keeps a close eye on its creation, the radical "Muslim Brotherhood."
Consequently, the West has been duped into believing that Islamic fundamentalism and terrorism are an autonomous and wholly Muslim reaction against the West. The so-called "war on terror" posited by President Bush is a bogus war fabricated by these Globalists who are using Islamic fundamentalism and Muslim terrorists as the dupes, the patsies, to demonise the Muslim world and bring it in conflict with the West. The "War on Terror" is merely the euphemism of the Globalist gambit for world conflagration designed to crush the remaining vestiges of nationalism and democracy in both Muslim countries and the West.
Although the controlled media and the Globalists lackeys have successfully made Osama bin Laden the Islamic bogeyman he is not, nor has he ever been, the leader of the international Islamist movement that is directed by the International Muslim Brotherhood. Similarly, the Muslim Brotherhood is a tool by the British-based Globalists; the Anglo-American establishment whose main objective is to overthrow the established world order and create a new one-world system of global governance. By fabricating a bogus war between Islamic fundamentalism and the West, and the West's response to it called the "War on Terror," the Globalists are able to attack their real enemy, which is humanity per se. The great puppet masters, the Lords of Power, the Black Adepts from the Cult of Evil, whom control the Anglo-American Establishment, also pull the strings of the Muslim Brotherhood. Moreover, that their stratagems using Islamic radicals and fundamentalism will ensure that both Western and Muslim states are so degraded that they will all finally succumb to their odious rule. The Lords of Power who control the Globalists and their collective activities have long been using wars to subvert, demoralise and destroy Western civilisation. Modern wars are not fought to defeat an enemy but to change society but especially to move society towards acceptance of the New World Order. In the Korean War and Vietnam War, they effectively tied US hands while backing the communist insurgents.
Steven Emerson has studied Islamic terrorism for almost 20 years and whose book, Terrorist (1991), tells us that during the 1980s the US State Department officials (the traitors who are Globalists) protected terrorist organisations, terrorist leaders and terrorist nations. In his book, American Jihad, he quotes Khalid Duran, a prominent Islamic scholar, who wrote:
Basically, it's a revolt against the modern world. People in modern societies are very cosmopolitan and tolerant of ethnic and cultural differences. . . . Wahhabism and Salafiyya are attempts to resurrect the pure pristine state whose natural consequence is the repudiation of Western secularism. Wahhabism and Salafiyya are in effect the antithesis of Western secular society. The video was effectively suppressed until after the 9/11/01 attack on the World Trade Center because it exposed things that the Globalists who are using Islamic terror did not want the American people to learn. Such things as the involvement of Islamic extremists in the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993, and their plan to attack the infrastructure of the American nation. In the video, Emerson states:
Hoping to halt the spread of Communism, the United States actively backed the Mujahideen, Afghanistan's Islamic rebels, dedicated to spreading Jihad. most . . . [Islamic] institutions in the United States are controlled by either extremists or profiteers. The American Muslim Council is an umbrella group of the 'Muslim Brotherhood' and it is actively involved in championing the movements of Hamas, Algerian FIS, Tunisian Al- Nahda movement, Turkish Welfare Party, Jordanian Islamic Action Front and the Sudanese National Islamic Front. The American Muslim Council does not represent American Muslims, it represents the extremists and those that believe in terrorism. Steven Emerson reveals that State Department officials allowed Azzam, to tour the US between 1985 and 1988:
". . . exhorting new recruits to pick up the sword against the enemies of Islam. According to The New York Times, our State Department allowed Dr. al-Zawahiri to tour the United States in 1995 despite the fact he was a known terrorist, and the Egyptian government wanted him for murder. "
Speaking at the Islamic training center in Oklahoma City in 1988, Azam said:
"O, brothers, after Afghanistan, nothing in the world is impossible for us anymore. There are no super powers or mini-powers - what matters is the will power that springs from our religious belief."
"Allah's religion - be he praised - must offer skulls, must offer martyrs. There are more than 88 in American cities. Their centres became clearing houses and recruiting offices to support Jihad around the world. The Globalists, to keep the American people from learning of the Islamic threat, suppressed Steven Emerson's video and other sources of information on the phenomenon. The US State Department allowed The American Muslim Council to act as an umbrella organisation for international terrorism. It also allowed the terrorist leaders Abdullah Azzam and Dr. al-Zawahiri to come to America, raise money, and recruit followers. The CIA financed Osama bin Laden and his followers during the Afghan war. It continued funding the Afghan Jihad after the war ended. Bin Laden also knew the CIA and the Saudis were financing the Islamic movement, and allowing leaders like Azzam and al-Zawahiri to raise funds unimpeded in the United States. The Washington Times reports:
If the information is accurate, then it is obvious that bin Laden is a CIA "asset" and explains why the US State Department and CIA are reluctant to apprehend Mr Osama bin Laden. However, the CIA chief George Tenet testified to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (02/06/02) that: Osama bin Laden:
"... did not believe that the United States would respond to the Sept. 11 attacks by attacking Afghanistan. Osama bin Laden was mistaken, for his group, al Qaeda, the Taliban regime and Afghan Jihad soon learned that they were mere pawns in the Great Game whose masters are the Lords of Power. Who are the secret masters of the Anglo-American Establishment whose benign front is the Council on Foreign Relations that has controlled American Foreign Policy since at least 1940.
"Notable among these new threats is the prospect of an attack on US cities by independent or state-supported terrorists using weapons of mass destruction. . . . States, terrorists, and other disaffected groups will acquire weapons of mass destruction and mass disruption, and some will use them. "... the US would be attacked on its own soil mostly by a small group of foreign terrorists, and that the attack could result in the loss of many American lives."
The World Future Society styles itself as a "nonprofit educational and scientific organization, a nonpartisan clearinghouse, for people interested in how social and technological developments are shaping the future." An article in the Nov/December 1994 issue states:
"The Muslim population in this country is not like any other group, for it includes within it a substantial body of people - many times more numerous than the agents of Osama bin Laden - who share with the suicide hijackers a hatred of the United States and the desire, ultimately, to transform it into a nation living under the structures of militant Islam."
In such conditions, one would expect a concerned government addressing the real problems and concerns of its people on such matters. Joseph D'Agostino's article "7000 Men Recently Entered From Al Qaeda 'Watch' Countries" in Human Events (December 17, 2001) we find two months after the 9/11/01 attack that:
". . . the State Department granted non-immigrant US visas to at least 7,000 men from countries in which al Qaeda is active. It appears for some unknown reason that the governments of the West, but especially the US, do not want to keep al Qaeda and other Muslim terrorists from entering their countries.
In The Washington Times "Militant Madrassas Ordered To Shut Down" (December 3, 2001) and the "New Law Targets Islamic Schools" (December 21, 2001) we read that Wahhabism is the official religion of Saudi Arabia. In Ahmed Rashid's book Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia (2001) we learn that "Taliban" is the Afghan word for student. In short, Rashid tells us that the Wahhabi regime in Afghanistan and the other branches of political Islam, want not only to re-establish the Muslim Empire that existed a thousand years ago, but to bring about a Muslim World Empire by killing Infidels and destroying Christian civilisation.
From other sources, such as Danna Harman's article "Links to 'mother al Qaeda' Probed" in The Washington Times (December 20, 2001), we learn that many other graduates were sent overseas to join al Qaeda cells in the United States, Europe, and other Muslim countries throughout the world. Moreover, Western society allows political dissent.
Steven Emerson's work is not the only example of this censorship designed to keep the American people in ignorance of the threat of domestic Islamic terrorism. Dr. Robert Morey, who has a degree in Islamic studies, wrote a book about this threat called The Islamic Invasion of America. However, shortly after the September 11 attack on the World Trade Center, powerful pressure was placed on Dr. Morey's publisher to recall his book and prevent it from being distributed. Simply because the US intelligence agencies, and the Shadow Government it serves, do not want the American people to understand what is happening in their country. Morey not only claims the Saudi government has spent billions of dollars building mosques, funding radical Muslim clerics, and promoting fundamental Islamic belief in the US, but also expended hundreds of millions of dollars on the propaganda. The astute reader will probably perceive a pattern emerging in the treatment of Islam in the West. While, on the other hand, the ancient pristine ferocious nature of Islam has been nurtured and encouraged to flourish wherever Muslims are found by the Globalists, but whose enmity and hatred for the West is concealed from the people of the West.
Thus we find in Jeffery Sheler's article in US News and World Report entitled "Muslim in America," (October 29, 2001) that
One moderate American Islamic leader, Sheikh Muhammad Hisham Kabbani, told a State Department forum in 1999 that 80 percent of the nation's mosques are headed by clerics who espouse 'extremist ideology' - which Kabbani associates with Wahhabism, an Islamic fundamentalist movement that began in Saudi Arabia in the 18th century."
Some Californian schools also force children to memorise verses from the Koran, and discuss the "problems" of Christianity as opposed to the "solutions" contained in the Muslim faith.
It is without question that several Muslim governments support the al Qaeda movement. One of the greatest supporters of Wahhabism and its export around the world is Saudi Arabia. One of the greatest supporters of Islamic terrorism and its export around the world is Saudi Arabia. Some of the terrorist organizations funded by Saudi Arabia include:
Al Qaeda
The Egyptian Islamic Jihad
The Palestinian Islamic Jihad
Regional branches of the Muslim Brotherhood
Jamiat-Ul-Ulema-e-Islam (the Muslim party with a strong presence in Pakistan and India)
Jund-al-Islam (Soldiers of Islam – strong Kurdish involvement)
Ansar-al-Islam (Guardians of Islam – until recently with bases in northern Iraq)
Islamic People's Congress of Sudan (strong ties to al-Qaeda and the Egyptian Jihad)
Islamic Army of Aden (operating in Yemen with strong financial ties to al-Qaeda and other Saudi sources)
Hiz-al-Takhrir-al-Saudi (The Saudi Liberation Party)
Arabian Peninsula Peoples Union
Islamic Reform Movement
Laurie Mylroie in her book, A Study of Revenge: Saddam Hussein's Unfinished War against America (2000) asserts that Saddam Hussein was responsible for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Yossef Bodansky, an expert in Islamic terrorism, and Director of The Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, in his book, Bin Laden: The Man Who Declared War on America (1999)
Knowledge, if true that has been deftly concealed form the American people by their own government. Moreover, if true, why did the US government exact revenge on these forces? Brzezinski also laid the foundation for the Islamic terrorist movement that now threatens the peace of the world. The 09/11/01 attack on the World Trade Center and the subsequent anthrax attack created the "widely perceived direct external threat" needed to unite the American people behind the Globalist agenda contained in the foreign policy of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the ethos of the Trilateral Commission. For, these atrocities were brought about by the Shadow Government to justify the "war against terrorism," and establish the New World Order.
Alexander Stille in an article in The New York Times entitled "What is America's Place in the World Now?" Three days after the attack on the World Trade Center, former Senator Gary Hart, a Globalist insider, addressed the Council on Foreign Relations:
The so-called Anglo-American Establishment is the exoteric expression of an ancient occult idea of a New World Order. This idea is the enduring ambition of an ancient occult organisation that seeks the total control of the world. This something was to bring about the government of the world under one supreme authority. In Quigley's The Anglo-American Establishment we read that:
Both sought to unite the world, and above all the English-speaking world, in a federal structure around Britain. The shadowy group has been very successful in keeping their sinister role in shaping world events a secret. Carroll Quigley's research concerning the role of the Rhodes-Milner Secret Societies in Britain from 1891 through World War II is the source of so much information about this group and is often quoted. Moreover, it appeared at a time when the Council on Foreign Relations began to attract attention. In 1909-1903 they organised semi-secret groups, known as Round Table Groups, in the chief British dependencies and in the United States."
Between 1910-1915 the Rhodes Secret Society evolved into an international group of co-conspirators collectively called Round Table Groups that set up in seven nations: Britain, South Africa, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, India, and the United States. The men who attended the meeting were British and American Rhodes Secret Society members who were also British and American delegates to the Paris Peace Conference convened to inaugurate the new Europe after the First World War. Moreover, their members occupy executive positions in the various branches of government, control the news agencies and television networks, head the largest law firms, direct the largest private foundations, are presidents of the most prestigious universities, and hold top commands in the military. It is thus through this organisational ring of "Institutes of International Affairs" and the outward control of tax-exempt foundations, universities, government agencies and media, that they determine the destiny of their nations, and other nations throughout the world. It is because of this octopus of power and influence, the Anglo-American Establishment, that the Globalist conspiracy has dominated the domestic and foreign policies of Britain and the United States for over seventy-five years. Anglo-American Establishment through its proxies in the CFR runs the State Department and the CIA. This 100 CFR member Praetorian Guard that surrounds the president is called "the Secret Team." This treacherous crew help carry out psycho-political operations (Psy-ops), the mass psychology, scripted by CFR members in the US State Department and the Intelligence Organizations. A group of Council on Foreign Relations members called the Special Group, evolved from the Psychological Strategy Board, co-ordinate the psycho-political operations (Psy-ops). An insider to this power structure was John Dewey (1859-1952), the American pragmatic philosopher and advocated of the so-called "progressive education." A coterie of men thus unlawfully and knowingly combine and conspire to bring about the conditions propitious for the establishment of a One World Government under the direct and total control of members of their group. The shadowy group influences public opinion through mass psychology, that is, well planned and co-ordinated psycho-political operations (Psy-ops). By these subtle, pervasive and powerful techniques and operations of manipulation of public opinion and mind control the group seeks to undermine people's confidence in their beliefs, their strength, their leaders and themselves.
In short, they seek to dissolve Natural Moral Order, Western civilisation, national sovereignty, nationalism, patriotism and society predicated on the spirituality often called Christianity.
The Humanist Agenda is the powerful weapon this sinister group uses to bring the destruction of Western society about. The sinister group works assiduously to destroy people's belief in their nation, the traditional family, Christ and God. The power to manipulate and mould opinion is phenomenal and this is what they do, creating false realities, illusions, false reality worlds, for people to believe. This control of people is indeed great but the group desires to make it absolute by the creation of its great ambition, the One World Government predicated on tyranny in which everyone is controlled, absolutely, from the cradle to the grave.
The group operates under the so-called Chatham House Rule.
Today the "Rule" is used by organizations and gatherings throughout the world.
By creating tension and hate between different groups of people, this group uses a very ancient ploy indeed to further their aims and increase their power and wealth. This secret-society continually creates a state of perpetual warfare within nations and between nations all over the world for it is only by these conflicts, these distractions that they think that they will gain their New World Order. The group, often called the Anglo-American Establishment, was responsible for the Boer War, World War I, World War II, the Korean War and Vietnam as well as the unrest and constant warfare in the Middle East by their sponsorship of both Zionism and fundamental Islam. British disciples of Rhodes and their American counterparts, who would later be identified as the Anglo-American Establishment, provoked the First World War in order to create a demand for world government. This group was also responsible for the Second World War again whose purpose was to bring the idea of world government more palatable to public opinion. The Korean and Vietnamese Wars were also created to advance the agenda of the wicked and evil men who work to bring about a New World Order.
Reginald Baliol Brett (1852-1930), the second Lord Esher, was chairman of the war office reconstitution committee after the South African War, the Boer War, in 1904. For Brett was a leader in the Rhodes secret society, the so-called Round Table that later became the Anglo-American Establishment, whose overarching ambition is the creation of a World Empire under its control. Contrived and controlled World wars and major conflicts are the means to this end.
Reader, understand, history is made by men in secret societies, in secret unions and in secret meetings and Freemasonry's hands are dripping with much blood.
King George V (1865-1936), who gave up his German title in 1917 during World War I, assured his cousin, Prince Henry, the Kaiser Wilhelm's brother, that Britain would not enter the coming war. History shows that Kaiser Wilhelm believed King George's promise that England would not enter the conflict that quickly became the First World War. The testimony of George Tenet, the chief of the CIA, to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence shows that Osama bin Laden did not believed that the United States would attack his sanctuary. Remember, reader, that modern wars are not fought to defeat an "enemy" but to change society. "Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. This newly inaugurated US government department is designed to co-ordinate government services during periods of civil unrest or terrorist attack. President Bush authorised formation of the Office of Homeland Security just nine days after the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center buildings and the Pentagon. The event caused the war that became known as Spanish-American War. The Globalist agenda called for the entry of the United States into the terrible conflict that became the Great War. The Lusitania went down taking with her 1198 people. The tragedy, along with a skilfully crafted propaganda programme that manipulated public opinion, eventually forced the United States into World War I. Fifty years after the sinking of the Lusitania the British authorities opened their files about the tragedy and British journalist Colin Simpson produced book, The Lusitania (1972). The attack on Pearl Harbor brought America into the Second World War, a war the majority of Americans did not want to join. Yet, the blueprint for World Empire demanded that the US was brought into this war and thus the Globalist traitors in government saw to it that this condition of the Evil Agenda was satisfied. Roosevelt and his secret masters had devised a plan to provoke the Japanese to attack the US in order to gain the support of the people who were adamantly opposed to entering the war. Stinnett shows that ample warning of the attack was on Roosevelt's' desk and that a plan to push Japan into war was initiated at the highest levels of the US Government. This Japanese "sneak attack" was the supposed act of treachery that forced the United States into World War II. "Yesterday," Roosevelt later told Congress, "December 7, 1941 –a date which will live in infamy- the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked…" This "infamy" however comes from the Globalists within government, the Shadow Government, who continually betray the American and British peoples and sacrifices them, their country and their freedoms on the altar of world government. From Carroll Quigley's book Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World In Our Time (1966) not only do we read that the Round Table Group was a front organisation for Cecil Rhodes' secret society but also that they supported Adolph Hitler's aggressive policies. This entanglement of great business relations all over the world would seem to me to argue strongly for peace. The book Hope of the Wicked: The Master Plan to Rule the World by Ted Flynn documents the duplicity of American corporations by helping the Nazis both before and during World War II. Professor Quigley relates in Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World In Our Time how the Round Table Group encouraged Hitler to take Austria, Czechoslovakia, and Poland while they quietly rearmed England for the coming war they had meticulously planned:
". . . the British government, especially the small group controlling foreign policy [the Round Table Group], had reached a seven-point decision regarding their attitude toward Germany:
Moreover, the Foreign Office submitted the seven-point plan to Germany, and expressed tacit support for Hitler's success. In his book, Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace (1953) he wrote:
The Round Table Group controlled the British Foreign Office before, during and after the Second World War. Britain and the United States subsequently gave substantial military supplies and aid to the Soviet Union. Moreover, after the war the Round Table Group did not object when the United States, following the treachery of the 32º Freemason, Franklin D. Roosevelt, turned Eastern Europe and China over to Communism. Rather, they used Hitler to foment the Second World War, just as the rulers of the US used Osama bin Laden to justify their "war against terrorism." Professor Quigley revealed the active and treasonous part played by The Round Table and the CFR in the events leading up to the Second World War. In 1942, delegates from many countries gathered to issue a Declaration of the United Nations, the first time the term "United Nations" had been publicly aired. Furthermore, the Shadow Government had compelled certain US political and military leaders to extend the war both in Europe and in the Pacific, even using the atomic bomb on civilian targets. This was done specifically to make modern war appear so horrible that world government could be presented to mankind as the only viable alternative.
General Douglas MacArthur (1880-1964) described in his autobiography, Reminiscences (1964) how the US State Department precipitated the Korean War. Moreover, President Truman refused to call it war for a very definite reason. One of the main reasons why the Globalists brought about the Korea War was that immediately after the Second World War the spirit of isolationism swept the US. Many of the American people and a significant portion of the US Congress favoured an end to US intervention in the world's affairs. Significant opposition to government-led internationalism began to increase. US Secretary of State Dean Acheson, a veteran member of the Council on Foreign Relations, shameless promoter of the United Nations and insider of the Globalist agenda, worked with his fellow travellers to bring the US into the Korean War. The "us" are the Globalists; the traitors who desire world government advanced by US interventionism in world affairs and the sacrifice of national sovereignty on the altar of internationalism. Acheson and other Globalists knew well that war not only brings about more government but also speeds the way toward world government. Moreover, in modern times such things are the norm in public life.
McCarthy asserted that some of these people were passing secret information to the Soviet Union, adding:
The "communists" who were in truth the internationalist, the Globalists, the "liberal establishment," such as people like Dean Acheson, Alger Hiss et al working to bring about a One World Government.
In his book In Love and War (1984), Stockdale revealed that:
Wars are the preferred choice of the Globalists. The Global Elite design wars to enable their plans to purloin the freedoms of the world's citizens by bringing about a global fascist state with them as absolute rulers and the masses as the absolute slaves. This world ambition is a clandestine process of incremental implementation of all things that a world government requires. The plan for a New World Order was so secret that knowledge of it was kept within the secret societies that plotted to bring it about. The contempt and arrogance of these people is staggering as is their world ambition.
Wars are paramount in this endeavour. The central banking system is in effect the world's most sophisticated cartel. However, most people, as was intended, consider them legitimate government agencies. Money is the fuel of war and without money, wars cannot be fought. These wicked people to bring them more wealth and power create Modern wars. For instance, in the initial stages of the First World War, Britain and France had to borrow heavily from investors in America. The absolute wealth and power of the Shadow Government is in large measure a product of war, of planned war, and of death, destruction and untold misery. Modern wars are not fought to defeat an enemy but to bring about changes in Western civilisation. The traumatic times when grief, fear, anxiety and anger distracts populations allowing the traitors, the internationalists, the Globalists, the Shadow Government, to social engineer Western society.
In 1963, a special commission of government experts met secretly in an underground base deep inside the earth in New York State called Iron Mountain. Its purpose was to devise stratagems for the worlds' governments to use to insure continuing control of the people of Earth, once the spurious Cold War was ended. The hidden rulers of this world, the Shadow Government, knew that wars were a tremendously effective means to channel the masses' energies into controlled events while permitting governments to establish and maintain social control. Wars were thus promoted as unavoidable for such things as state security and defence needs, to present a common front against the enemy, protect the people's way of life and economic standards and so forth. If however, hidden rulers of this world, the Shadow Government abolished wars; the committee's task was to come up with alternative mechanisms and methods of social control. The secret committee's final report to the President of the United States was informally entitled Report from Iron Mountain on the Possibility and Desirability of Peace (RFIM) in which was presented five substitutes for war in the future event when the worlds secret rulers chose to end the bogus Cold War and to establish a New World Order based on "peace" and "co-operation" among the world nations but especially the so-called "superpowers." War, argued the report, was too important to the world economy, and therefore it was necessary to continue a state of war indefinitely:
"War has provided both ancient and modern societies with a dependable system for stabilizing and controlling national economies. Moreover, the authority of the government over the people stemmed from its ability to wage war, therefore, without war the government might cease to exist since:
The elimination of war implies the inevitable elimination of national sovereignty and the traditional nation-state."
"War can be used to arouse human passion and patriotic feelings of loyalty to the Nations leader. So many things that otherwise are incomprehensible suddenly become clear: foreign aid, wasteful spending, the destruction of American industry, a job corps, gun control, a national police force, the apparent demise of soviet power, a UN army, disarmament, a world bank, a world money, the surrender of national independence through treaties, and the ecology hysteria."
The power brokers, the Lords of Power, who make vast profits from war are not only interested in money but in a world ambition as well
Now, gentle reader, the reason for attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center, on Afghanistan and on Iraq may now become a little clearer. That wars are never fought for the reasons given to the men who fight them and that terrorist atrocities within sovereign nations invariably are not the fruits of those terrorist organisations blamed for them. Wars are created to change society. A bogus war in which all opposition to it is vilified as treason, where all opponents are deemed traitors and where money and power will consistently flow to the Global Elite, the Lords of Power, whose ancient and sacred mission is to control the world absolutely and for all time.
the Radical Islamic Super-terrorist ..... and that is why Western Intelligence Agencies created the modern phenomenon of Radical Fundamentalist Islam.
The world, and especially the American people, whose taxes were used in this, has not been told the truth about the origin of the Afghan war and al Qaeda. Practically everyone knows about the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and the culpability of Muslim extremists. Yet, very few people know that radical Islam and its attendant terrorism is largely the creation and creature of Western intelligence agencies.
From John Cooley's book Unholy Wars: Afghanistan, America and International Terrorism (1999) we learn that during the 1980s, the Central Intelligence Agency recruited thousands of Arabs from Muslim countries ostensibly to fight the wicked and nasty communists in Afghanistan. Moreover, that the Muslims trained by the US Special Forces went on to train others, and when the Afghan war ended, many of them joined al Qaeda. These young men were radicalised by a deliberate, well-funded programme of indoctrination financed and carried out by the CIA, the Pakistani Intelligence agency (ISI), and Saudi Arabia government. Richard Labeviere's book Dollars for Terror: The United States and Islam (2000) tells us that the CIA printed thousands of copies of the Koran in Virginia. "Iran was encouraging a Muslim religious revival in Soviet Central Asia. "A specter haunts the world . . . the specter of religious fanaticism . . . theocratic ideologies have declared a cold war on the democracies. . . . Where does the money for this dangerous proselytism come from - the money that finances mosques and Koran schools, supports Islamist organizations, orchestrates the fight against the 'impious' regimes of the Arab-Muslim world, and organizes the activism of certain Muslim communities of Europe . . . four years of research have established that the real threat lies . . . in Saudi Arabia and other oil monarchies allied with the United States. The greatest world power is fully aware of this development. In certain parts of the world, the CIA and its Saudi and Pakistani homologues continue to sponsor Islamism."
". . . the United Arab Emirates . . . but US officials say that financial systems in other countries - including Pakistan and Germany - were also used to funnel money to accounts controlled by suspected ringleader Mohammed Atta and other hijackers. This money was then forwarded to Mohammed Atta who apparently led the September 11 attack.
As well . . . "Time Magazine" is reporting that some of that money came in the days just before the attack and can be traced directly to people connected to Osama bin Laden. Pakistani Intelligence (ISI) is a surrogate of the Central Intelligence Agency and the British Intelligence Service themselves surrogates of the Anglo-American Establishment- the Shadow Government of this world. The role of these agencies is crucial in the unfolding of the wicked and evil plan for this world, the bringing about of the blueprint for world government that is the Evil Agenda. An organisation founded in 1921 on the principles of the Rhodes secret society, the British Round Table Group An organisation that has since 1940 controlled US Foreign Policy. The Anglo-American Establishment created the CIA, and the CIA largely created the Islamic terrorists that threaten the West today. James Cooley, who writes for the Christian Science Monitor, in his book, Unholy Wars: Afghanistan, America, and International Terrorism (1999), informs us that:
Cooley also described the funding of the Islamic movement during the Afghan war:
Cooley further reveals that the KMS, a British Muslim mercenary organization, provided the British Muslim contingent sent to Afghanistan:
"In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings. . . . For although the Afghan war ended in 1989, Agency for International Development officials continued to provide the textbooks until 1994:
"AID officials say in interviews that they left the Islamic materials intact because they feared Afghan educators would reject books lacking a strong dose of Muslim thought. The AID spokeswoman stated: 'It's not AID's policy to support religious instruction,' . . . . A war that was itself a creation of the Anglo-American Establishment whose agent, Zigbniew Brzezinski represented their interests and those of the Rockefeller family. The pristine, original form of Islam is ferocious, merciless and unforgiving, otherwise its spectacular successes would never have happened in so short a time
"Traditional" Islam is in fact an amalgam of distortions that constitute abuses and corruptions of pure, pristine Islam
Radical Muslim sects such as Wahhabism and Salafiyya sought to overthrow the abuses and corruptions of "traditional" Islam. Jihad is the Sixth Pillar of Islam and is one of many sacred duties Muslims are obliged to perform
Salafiyya cult arose in the thirteenth century and became fashionable again in certain parts of the Muslim world but especially in Egypt in the Muslim Brotherhood whose motto is:
"Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. It is the official ideology of Saudi Arabia who nurtures its creed inside its own borders but now sends out Wahhabi clerics to wherever Muslims are found in the world
Islamic fundamentalism of the last half-century is a stranger to "traditional Islam" and is based on something entirely different- the pristine, original form of Islam. It is thus essentially a revolt against the modern world. Islamic fundamentalism tries to re-establish the pristine original nature of Islam, withdraw from cosmopolitan secular society and establish an ethnic purity based upon the Islam taught by Mohammed
The radical Islamic doctrines were extended by force and imposed by the sword just as had the original Islam instituted by Mohammed. The renewal of the belief that Muslims can never peacefully co-exist with non- Muslims due to the division of the world into two warring factions: the Muslims or the "Dar al Islam" (The abode of Islam) and non- Muslims or the "Dar al Harb" (The abode of war)
The renewal of the ambition to unify all Muslims under a single state and the elimination of non-Muslim nations. That is, the reawakening of the Islamic world ambition and the wish to create a Muslim World Empire in which Islam reigns supreme
Islam does
There are two fundamental types of Muslim terrorist: the Islamic fundamentalist Muslim and the Marxist-Socialist Muslim. The former are united in their radical, fundamental belief in the pure creed of Mohammed and hate, among others, the Marxist-Socialist Muslim. Their one leader is Allah. The latter are secular Muslims who hate, among others, Islamic fundamentalist Muslims. The radical Islamic movement has been energised and funded by Western intelligence services but especially by the CIA and its dependents such as the Pakistani Intelligence agency (ISI)
The CIA and Saudi Arabia largely finance the Islamic movement
The CIA has financed the radical Islamic movement since its inception including the Algerian FIS, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Jordanian Islamic Action Front, the Sudanese National Islamic Front, the Tunisian Al-Nahda movement, the Turkish Welfare Party and al Qaeda
During the 1980s, the CIA financed Osama bin Laden and his followers during the Afghan war and they continued funding the Afghan Jihad after the war ended in 1989. Osama bin Laden worked for the CIA and helped the United States force the Soviets to withdraw their troops from Afghanistan. The United States supplied both Iran and Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war.
CIA conceived textbooks that the Agency for International Development (AID) provided to Afghan and Pakistani schoolchildren promote radical Islamic belief, militancy, violence, hatred of foreigners, and jihad.
This programme indoctrinated several hundred thousand Muslim children in Islamic fundamentalism, and encouraged a rabid hatred of infidels. Pakistan established 20-30,000 Islamic schools and seminaries where Muslims were indoctrinated in the original form of Islam, the pristine pure form of Islam that today is called the radical Islam. In 1990, the American Ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie, assured the nasty, wicked, Saddam Hussein that the United States would not intervene if he invaded Kuwait. The United States defeated the Iraqi army in a few days, and left the nasty, wicked, Saddam Hussein in power.
In 1994, the Taliban movement had come to power in Afghanistan. The US State Department and CIA to counter the havoc they help create allied themselves with two Islamic powers, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. The schools in which young Muslims were indoctrinated in the original form of Islam. In short, the United States helped Saudi Arabia and Pakistan create the Taliban, financed the Taliban, and then destroyed the Taliban.
US officials coerced Saudi leaders into allowing the United States to station troops in their country to "protect" them from the nasty, wicked, Saddam Hussein. The presence of infidels living close to Mecca and Medina horrified radicals like Osama bin Laden and other members of al Qaeda who turned against the Saudi government and the United States.
Fifteen of the nineteen terrorists who supposedly attacked America by apparently attacking the WTC and the Pentagon on "9/11" were Saudi citizens. The US State Department, directed by the CIA allows leaders of the Islamic terrorist movement like Abdulla Azzam and Dr al-Zawahiri to raise funds in the United States. Despite the fact they are known terrorists, and the Egyptian government wanted al-Zawahiri for murder
US government officials knew Osama bin Laden was involved in the attacks on US military bases, but they did not try to arrest him. The CIA-bin Laden links stretches back years and appears to suggest bin Laden gave the CIA information regarding future terrorist strikes
Richard Labeviere, the author of Dollars for Terror, as well as other researchers, claims that the Islamic terrorist movement is ultimately the creation of the CIA, Saudi Arabia, Pakistani Intelligence (ISI) and some US agencies.
Because Western Intelligence Agencies and their surrogates control much of what is called "International Terrorism" and especially "Islamic Terrorism" the apparent failure to defeat them or stop further outrages sometime manifests as personal attacks on leaders and politicians alluding to their incompetence by less informed commentators.
"Your government failed you. Consequently, it is internationalist in outlook and works secretly to bring about World Government and it is, like all modern administrations since the time of Woodrow Wilson, traitors to the American people. Why? Because it works to undermine the fact that the United States of America was founded as a Constitutional Republic of Sovereign States based upon Biblical principles and whose supreme law of the land was contained in the inspired document called the "Constitution of the United States" but ultimately that wisdom and truth found in "The Declaration of Independence." Clark's allegation that Bush's national security team was asleep at the wheel in the months before September 11 2001 when certain intelligence specialists were warning of an impending terrorist strike is symptomatic of the phenomenon of uniformed, outsider analysis of the agenda to deliver America and its people, hog-tied, to the Globalists and their long-dreamed, long-awaited and long planned, One World Government. Intrinsic to this plan is the use of FEAR to coerce people and nations to abandon ancient affiliations, to cut age-old bonds and to adopt internationalist principles so that they will be more amenable to the concept of World Government and so that much easier to merge into the New World Order. For, these architects of the New World Order understand completely that people are more than willing to sacrifice what freedoms they still posses for a greater sense of security. That is why they control those things, such as "Global Terrorism", which significantly increases the fear of people. Some US government officials knew all about the plan to attack the World Trade Center and the Pentagon just as some officials knew about the terrorist plan to bomb the World Trade Center in 1993, and the terrorists plan to bomb the Murrah Building in 1995, the so-called "Oklahoma City bombing." Corruption of the US government agencies is rife and the higher echelons of them work for this Globalist dream and thus work for the Shadow Government and not the US Government. All refused to examine Jayna Davis's material, because it they were stark documentation that give compelling evidence that connect the Oklahoma City bombing and the 09/11/01 attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. Not all government agents are corrupt or willingly serving the Shadow Government and dozens of FBI and Defense Intelligence agents were threatened with arrest by the federal government if they got in the way of al-Qaeda operations. "A former Iranian-government intelligence officer who has defected to the West tells Insight during telephone interviews from Germany that he personally informed the FBI at the beginning of September of a plot by Iran to crash civilian jumbo jets into the World Trade Center and government buildings in Washington. "Mr. Tenet . . . said Mr. Bin Laden did not believe that the United States would respond to the Sept. 11 attacks by attacking Afghanistan. Furthermore, when George Tenet appeared before the Senate Intelligence Committee on February 6, 2002, and stated that:
Mr. Bin Laden did not believe that the United States would respond to the Sept. 11 attacks by attacking Afghanistan. Tenet's testimony raises two important questions: How did he know that Osama bin Laden "did not believe we would invade his sanctuary,'" and why did Osama bin Laden assume the US would not respond to the September 11 attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon? Control of every aspect of an individual's existence is a crucial part of the Evil Agenda and that is why the New World Order necessitates the total removal of personal and societal freedoms. This is the raison d'être of manufactured wars and the creation of urban terrorism: to frighten people into relinquishing ever more of their God-given freedoms. In short, Echelon is the global electronic communications surveillance system that represents an extreme threat to not only the privacy of people all over the world but also their very freedoms. In short, we live in the most monitored and controlled society that has ever existed. To understand this question one must understand how this world is truly organised and how and who really runs the temporal affairs of it. MODERN WARS AND CONFLICTS ARE CONCEIVED BY MEN IN DARK UNIONS AND SECRET MEETINGS AND THEY ARE NOT FOUGHT TO DEFEAT A POSITED ENEMY BUT TO CHANGE SOCIETY INTO A DESIRED STATE.
If one begins to understand this, then one may also understand that there is a similarity between the origin of the wars and conflicts of the last two centuries, and the so-called "war against terrorism." In modern times, this method of population manipulation and control is not used merely to strengthen the grip of petty tyrants but to bring about the conditions propitious for a world government. In fact, the Globalists and the secret societies that they haunt have a blueprint for world government that demands three World Wars: two have been affected; the conditions for the third are rapidly being brought together. The First World War was intended to create a demand for world government that would be so clamorous that it would dissolve all opposition to it. The Third World War will use Islam and its opposition and hatred of the West and Zionism as the touch paper for world conflagration.
The Shadow Government controlling American killed its own people
To appreciate that the official story of the events now often called "9/11" or "September 11" are a myth and that the perpetrators are not those identified by the US Government and its lackeys in the controlled media is a major step towards understanding how the world is manipulated by very powerful, evil and wicked forces. These forces have used wars, conflicts and terrorism as convenient yet potent means of manipulating public opinion and sentiment to further their own secret agenda for world government. ■ 1994: members of the Armed Islamic Group hijacked an Air France flight, flew it to Marseilles and demanded 27,000 tons of fuel. Intelligence agencies throughout the world knew that Arab terrorists planned to use commercial airliners as weapons to attack high-profile targets.
■ 1995: Philippine police confiscated a lap top computer that belonged to an Islamic terrorist called Abdul Murad. Bill Gertz of the Washington Times in an article called "Airliner terror plan was code-named 'Project Bojinka,'" reported that:
The operation called for hijacking US-bound commercial airliners. . . . The hijacked air- craft were to be crashed into structures in the United States, including the World Trade Center, the White House, Pentagon, the Transamerica Tower in San Francisco and the Sears Tower in Chicago."
■ 1998 August: CIA intelligence reports that Arab terrorists are planning to fly a bomb-laden aircraft into the WTC (World Trade Center).
■ 2001 before August: US intelligence agencies give copious warnings to the US government of possible terrorist attacks by al Qaeda and other groups against American targets, including commercial aircraft. ■ 2001, July: US and Italian officials were warned that Islamic terrorists might attempt to kill President Bush and other leaders by crashing an airliner into the Genoa summit of industrialized nations. ■ 2001 August: New York Times staff writers Richard Serrano and John-Thor Dahlburg reported in an article called "Officials Told of 'Major Assault' Plan":
"FBI and CIA officials were advised in August that as many as 200 terrorists were slipping into this country and planning 'a major assault on the United States,' a high-ranking law enforcement official said Wednesday. ■ 2001 September: a 29-year old Iranian phoned US police before September 11th from his German deportation cell to warn of the planned attack on the World Trade Center. The Muslim community across the world was aware of the possibility of a terrorist attack against major US targets. ■2001 September 11: Muslim fundamentalists apparently crashed three hijacked commercial airliners into the "twin towers" at the World Trade Center complex and the Pentagon.
■ 2001 September 13: Michael Duffy writing in Time magazine (October 15, 2001) in an article called "War on All Fronts," quoted Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld warning America that the coming conflict will:
■ 2001September 15: President Bush told the American people in a radio address that:
First, that US and other Western governments were acutely aware of the threat of jetliners-as-bombs. ■ 1993 February: Arab Fundamentalists bombed the World Trade Center complex. The explosion in the basement of the World Trade Center killed six people, wounded 1000, and the structures sustained a half-billion dollars damage. ■ An FBI informant called Emad A. Salem had warned his handlers that an Arab Fundamentalist terrorist group planned to bomb the "twin towers" at the World Trade Center. (2) In the book Study of Revenge: Saddam Hussein's Unfinished War Against America (2000 Dr. Laurie Mylroie claims that both Jim Fox, former FBI Supervisor in New York, and James Woolsey, former Director of the CIA, believed Saddam Hussein was responsible for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Moreover, why was Saddam Hussein not punished immediately after the attack?
■ 1995: Former President Clinton and his security chiefs repeatedly scorned vital intelligence that would have destroyed numerous worldwide terror cells, especially Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda. In August, a CIA intelligence report asserts that Arab terrorists are planning to fly a bomb-laden aircraft into the WTC.
■ 1998-2000: spies in Afghanistan report bin Laden's location on three occasions. Each time, Clinton approves an attack and each time, the CIA Director says the attack can not go forward
President Bush ordered the FBI to "back off" from investigating Abdullah bin Laden, the Saudi royals, and the World Association of Muslim Youth (WAMY), a front for Islamic terrorism who openly extols the virtues and ideals of Osama bin Laden in their education pamphlets. Bin Laden apparently provided Mitchell with "precise information" regarding "an imminent attack" on the US. Congress and the justice department were not interested in receiving Schippers' information of impending terrorist attacks. ■ 2001 September 10: "Newsweek reports (9/24/01) that a group of top Pentagon officials suddenly cancelled travel plans for the next morning, the day of the "9/11" attack, apparently because of security concerns."
Pentagon officials therefore knew the time and locations of the imminent attack as well as the method of using jetliners-as-bombs.
George Walker Bush, the President of the United States
■ 2001 September 11: Hours after the "9/11" attacks; a "shadow government" is formed around the President. ■ 2001 September 13-19: Bin Laden's family living in America are taken under FBI supervision to a secret assembly point and leave the country on a private charter plane when airports reopen three days after the attacks.
You're not going to believe what state I was in when I heard about the terrorist attack. ■ 2002 October 27: Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld recommends the creation of a super-intelligence body that would launch secret operations to "stimulate reactions" among terrorists and states owning weapons of mass destruction. It would prod terrorists into action to force "quick-response" attacks by US.
An event that has enormous ramifications for not only America but also the whole world. Waleed Al Shehri, a Saudi Arabian pilot, was named by the FBI as one of the suicide pilot who had crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre. My son called me the day after the attacks on September 12 at around midday. The scenario painted by the US Government and its lackeys in the press is that a group of nineteen Islamic fundamentalists with an abiding hatred of America carried out an audacious and outrageous attack on the symbols of US power and prestige. Moreover, what help they got was from foreign nationals and rogue states with an equally abiding hatred of the "Great Satan" that is America. The team of eminent architects designed the World Trade Center to withstand the direct impact and fuel fire of a commercial airline crash. It is certainly nowhere near high enough to even begin explaining the World Trade Center Tower collapse. The evidence showing that explosive devices demolished the World Trade Center towers is compelling. Various witnesses and survivors reported hearing bombs going off inside the World Trade Center. Manning understood this and wrote despairingly:
The New York Times reported that:
"FEMA is controlling everything," the team member said."
Controlled Demolition is indeed controlled …. by the US Government ……..
One of them was the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA):
"Central Intelligence Agency's clandestine New York station was destroyed in Sept 11 attack on World Trade Center, seriously disrupting US intelligence operations; station was in 7 World Trade Center, one of smaller office towers destroyed in aftermath of collapse of twin towers; all CIA employees at site were safely evacuated; agency immediately dispatched special team to scour rubble in search of secret documents and intelligence reports stored in station"
Evidence destruction of course may be part of the reason but the primary reason was the psychological and emotional manipulation of the American people into supporting future wars that if proposed before "9/11" would have met with stiff opposition. Would the American people have supported the adventure in Afghanistan or the invasion of Iraq, Syria and Iran if the bogeyman of radical Islam and "weapons of mass destruction" supposedly held by Muslim rogue states had not been raised?
Then, the people who orchestrate these mass psychology exercises are masters of their dark art and understand how easily people wishfully think the best out of every situation, especially when confronted with evidence of high treason from high government officials. So to is the aftermath of this tragedy, when the war drums were beat, the trumpets blasted, and the lumbering beast that is the USA was moved to make war with the Muslim World. The personal tragedy involved with the mass murder of three thousand people notwithstanding, "Black Tuesday" was indeed a dark event in the history of human liberty.
"Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith but to become dominant. The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth."
Omar M. Ahmad, Chairman of the Board of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) Islamic conference held in Freemont, California July 1998
Apologists tell us that the fundamentalist Islamic terrorists are wholly unrepresentative of Islam. Moreover, that they are terrorists committing crimes against humanity, who pervert Islam in a vain attempt to justify the unjustifiable. Islamic apologists tell us that the great majority of Muslims are totally opposed to the terrorist atrocities carried out by co-religionists. Muslims danced in the streets of the West Bank towns and in Gaza when they heard the news of attacks on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon. They danced in parts of Lebanon while in Baghdad, state television played a song "Down with America" as the World Trade Centre towers collapsed. It was also well documented phenomenon throughout the World and in certain cities in the West that classes of students and children of the Muslim faith cheered and punched the air in glee at news of the World Trade Center tragedy while making fun of the American national anthem. Nothing in the history or the culture of Arabs and Muslims allows them to put this peculiarly Western experience into any form of political practice. From the dawn of Islam, the Muslim World has been subject to a theocratic system, a cast-iron absolute system, in which the ruler does as he pleases, and the rest have no redress. There is virtually an absence of processes of compromise at all levels of Islamic society: Islam is not and never will be fertile ground for democracy. In the absence of processes of compromise at any level of society, it is not coincidences that throughout the history of Islam despots have ruled the Muslim World. If Secular Muslims live in Muslim countries, only the bravest of them will dare say what they really think of resurrected pure pristine Islam, for fear of persecution and assassination. From time to time, Islamic Fundamentalists threaten to overthrow their secular rulers, which invariably produce ghastly tests of strength between the two. The hatred of the ordinary Muslim for the West ultimately derives from his deep conviction that Allah lives through the Koran and that this book tells him to hate and destroy that, which is not Islam. However, the flagrant injustice and violence of daily Muslim life in Muslim states exacerbate this hatred. The peculiar position of the Muslim, one foot in the past and one in the present, under absolute conformity to Allah or unfettered freedom offer by the West, causes great tension within the psyche of the modern Muslim. The terrorists took great care in the selection of their targets: the World Trade Centre stood as a symbol of American success, just as the Pentagon symbolises its military might. The terrorists cannot make aircraft, but in their attack, they also took great care to convert American technology into an instrument against America. Moreover, that it is now time for Americans to suffer, in the eyes of the world but especially the Muslim World, the shame and humiliation oppressing them and their like. Apologists of Islam state that Islam is a tolerant religion, but neglect the caveat that this tolerance exists only in Western countries; it is most certainly not tolerant on its own home ground. Christian churches if allowed to operate are forbidden to call themselves churches. In Muslim World, the Christian Church is secretly hated but indulged because of geopolitical realities and fear of retribution if this secret desire is satisfied. The fact of the matter of mass Muslim migration and the presence of large minorities of Muslims throughout the Western world is that are large proportion of these is not prepared to adapt to Western way of life. The enacting of immigration laws throughout the West by its corrupt liberal governments crudely interrupted this certainty and changed Western culture forever.
The history of immigration acts pushed through the parliaments and senates of the Western world after the Second World War, and to the great dismay of the vast majority, are a shameful betrayal of the inheritance of the Western people whose forbears sacrificed so much to secure. This seemingly irresistible force is the true temporal government of this world, the Shadow Government, the secret cabal of very powerful men who have the leaders of the world, the Bushes and Blairs, dancing on the end of strings.
Multiculturalism is one of the most potent weapons in the armoury of the Globalists in their battle to destroy nations and peoples, but especially Western nations, in readiness for their long-planned and their eagerly awaited New World Order.
The great obstacle to One World Government is the human propensity to nationalism and patriotism predicated on ancient tribal loyalty and tribal blood-consciousness centred upon the folk-soul. The exoteric expressions of this ancient Brotherhood of Evil are such political power structures as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute for International Affairs, the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderbergers. These modern, seemingly secular, affair" concerned with "international affairs" are in truth mechanisms of control, influence and corruption to undermine sovereignty, nationalism and patriotism of all nations and peoples by promoting all things that foster "internationalism" and ""Globalism."." The ruling class of America, the UK and most Western nations are a small band of people who have control of the political, corporate, financial spheres; they also effectively control public and academic discourse as well. "As one individual may be morally incapable, without moral self-command, without moral power, so may a whole state."
Every aspect of western civilisation has been impacted by these doctrines, beliefs and philosophies so much so that the modern world is indeed in an advanced state of decay. A most powerful and persuasive force is committed to a campaign of world wide revolution by destroying the existing order. This force manifests in countless ways but each one is designed to advance the ancient agenda for World Empire. A prerequisite of this agenda is the destruction of Natural Moral Order on Earth, by bringing the world into moral and physical chaos, but especially the Western world founded on the morality arising from Christianity. Simultaneously it seeks to impose on the whole world a "solution" to the chaos it has caused which is the "new world order," a totalitarian world government predicated on tyranny. The Humanist Agenda is the corrosive power that is dissolving the ancient social cement binding Western civilisation together. The ultimate aim is to create a multicultural society, to destroy the will of Western nations and tribes to resist, by playing one group or "community" against another thereby controlling them all, while irrevocably changing Western society. Why should this powerful force (some call it the Shadow Government, the Anglo-American Establishment or the Illuminati) want the destruction of Western civilisation? Because it wants to destroy the ancient moral order and resurrect from its shattered parts a New World Order with its One World Government and One World Religion. The creation of a New World Order is the ancient dream of secret societies throughout the ages and many people throughout history have worked to bring this diabolic scheme to fruition. Consequently, this ancient agenda for World Empire that had remained a closely guarded secret of the occult societies for centuries has now become an "Open Conspiracy." There are now a plethora of sources referring to this movement towards Global Governance, called variously "internationalism," "Globalism," "New World Order," "One World Government," "New Age Religion," "United Nations," "International Community" etc., etc. "The world is reeling from the impact of the recent invasion of Iraq by American and British forces. The world, too, awaits the emergence of Maitreya to show men the way ... They will make accord with their brothers and sisters throughout the world, and in unison, inspired by Maitreya, they will bring justice, and therefore peace, to the waiting world."
Two Word Wars were planned and precipitated by the secret societies to further this move towards the New World Order the third they believe will deliver them total victory on Earth in their war with God. The wicked and evil people behind the Evil Agenda have carefully nurtured the United States of America to be the main economic and military vehicle of this assault on the Natural Moral Order on Earth. It is the watchword of the secret societies that brought Europe to its knees in two World Wars, as it is the watchword of the same secret power that is working to bring the whole world into chaos in the long-planned Third World War.
The New World Order has two aspects to it: the secular which is contained in the idea of the One World Government and the spiritual that is contained in the idea of the One World Religion. Although the vast majority of Westerners have lost faith in God, the wicked and evil people behind the move towards the New World Order have not lost faith in their gods. The people who are behind the move towards the New World Order, the Humanist Agenda, the "New Age," "Globalism," the United Nations and the plethora of other organisations promoting "internationalism" are very powerful men who serve a different god than the God of the Bible. They are Luciferians and Satanists who work to bring about conditions in the world that will be propitious for the incarnation of their gods on earth. Although the majority of mankind has lost knowledge of its spiritual inheritance, the very powerful men and women who rule the world have never lost theirs. The spiritual force that energises the people who rule the world is Evil and the Dark Gods, Lucifer and Ahriman are at its head. Evil is twofold it has two faces: these are dark spirits of immense power, who are called Ahriman and Lucifer. For, they are the Dark Gods, Ahriman and Lucifer, who ultimately seek the Crown of Creation itself. Two spirits of immense power, the Dark Gods, Lucifer and Satan, who is called Ahriman, head the ancient spirituality that opposes God. The wicked and evil people who are the human agents of influence in this assault on Natural Moral Order on Earth worship these Dark Gods and work to bring about conditions propitious for the New World Order with Lucifer and Ahriman at its head. It is in effect controlled chaos: from the micro-managed event, such as an assassination of a President, to the macro-managed events such as a World War. The history of the world is littered with the corpses of nations and empires that took this course. Any honest student of history understands this reality. It is also, why the wicked and evil people who seek to create this New World Order have commanded their placemen in government, the media, the universities, the "think tanks," the "great tax-exempt foundations" to control public and academic discourse, to promote specious social theories and stifle debate, and work to destroy Western culture in whatever and by whatever means. Key to this plan is the destruction of the ancient tribal bloodlines and folk souls of the peoples who forged Western civilisation. Civic society is founded on laws based on shared values, and any state has the right to intervene to protect them. Behind the move to World Government are various groups, both exoteric and occult, which are described variously by different commentators as, for instance, internationalists, Globalists, the Global Elite, the Shadow Government, the Anglo-American Establishment or the Illuminati. Whatever one chooses to call this cabal working in the shadows to bring about global governance, the great obstacle to its plan is the concept of the sovereign nation state. This concept has to be destroyed before the majority of humanity adopts One World Government. The great weapon used by this secretive cabal in their assault on the sovereign nation state is multiculturalism and a primary component of this is Muslims and Islam.
Powell's now infamous speech to, which The Times called in an editorial titled "An Evil Speech,"
"Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. It is this contempt for the West that was, for instance, behind the inauguration in 1992 by Dr Kalim Siddiqui of The Muslim Parliament of Great Britain whose avowed aim was a radical new sort of Muslim political organisation for minority Muslim communities living the West: a "minority political system for Muslims in Britain" and a "non-territorial Islamic state". "I'm a Muslim who happens to live in Britain. My allegiance is to Allah and the religion he brought down, Islam."
The ethos to fight America not just on American soil, not just in the Middle East, but everywhere was inspired by the secret initiatives and funding of the crucial components of modern Islamic terror by Western intelligence agencies and their proxies. For the presence of millions of Muslims in the West, their barely concealed hatred and rancour for the West, the creation of modern Islamic terror and the attack on Islam by the West (the war in Afghanistan, Iraq and the future conflicts with Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia) are part of the meticulous plan to subvert Western civilisation. The attack on the WTC and Pentagon was indeed a dark event in the history of human liberty. Why was the destruction wrought by unknown agencies blamed on Islamic terrorists that by doing so constituted an apparent declaration of war by Islam on the United States, on the hub of the world economy, on the Jewish people, on Zionist State of Israel and on Western civilisation? Especially, if these unknown agencies understood that such an act of aggression would oblige the free world to respond to this challenge, if these same unknown agencies understood that the people of America would not tolerate such an assault on their peaceful way of life.
A belief derived form an instinctive sense that geography somehow isolated the United States from the tumult of the world. This new land called America, an optimistic country where only the optimists went. For with the supposed Muslim inspired and led attacks, involving suicide crashes hitting America at the centre of its wealth and - in the Pentagon - at the epicentre of its military power, it now appeared that the outside world is doing to Americans what was once thought inconceivable. Muslim suicide missions are nothing new. The founder and spiritual leader of the Ashishin was Hasan ibn al-Sabah who from his mountain stronghold spread terror across the Muslim world. This power was only broken by the determined efforts of Muslim states, which not only feared for their continued existence but also believed it was doing enormous damage to the Islamic faith.
Democracy literally means government by the people as a whole rather than by any section, class or interest within. In general terms, democracy is the political orientation of those who favour government by the people or by their elected representatives and a political system in which the supreme power lies in a body of citizens who can elect people to represent them. Democracy is thus either "direct" or "representative" government. This then is "democratic government." The shear scale of modern society precludes "direct" government by the people. Modern Western civilisation has thus developed a form of government best described as "constitutional democracy." The people are not threatened with arbitrary arrest and imprisonment
The people have universal suffrage and elections to select "representatives."
Change of government according to the majority vote, that is, the "will" of the "people"
The second enemy of democracy are those who profess to favour the principles of democracy but assert that they are inadequate for the modern world. In most modern dictionaries, "Republic" is usually defined as political system whose head of state is not a monarch and in which the supreme power lies in a body of citizens who can elect people to represent them. In short, a Republic is a government of elected representatives. "REPUBLIC, n. In short, the power of government arises from the people and that government operates within and in accordance with strict laws and regulations. Moreover, that because of this restriction on personal abuse of elected office, Republic is a form of limited government operating on the authority of "We the people." In this sense, the Constitution is not only the grant of authority for the US government but also it is the Law of the People for the control of the government.
The 32nd President of the United States who worked to betray his nation to the ambition of the secret societies, of which he was a member, which is to bring about a New World Order with its One World Government and One World Religion. The Globalists want to foster this confusion because they understand all too well that the Republic is an almost insurmountable obstacle to bringing about One World Government and has to be destroyed. In contrast, Democracies are the stepping-stones to tyranny: all thinking people and tyrants understand this. Thomas Jefferson, 3rd President of the United States; chief drafter of the Declaration of Independence:
John Adams, 2nd President of the United States (1815):
Remember, democracy never lasts long. James Madison, 4th President of the United States, Federalist Paper #10 (1787)
Wells was an ardent socialist of the Fabian persuasion and so wrote from this perspective and was thus an advocate of and defender of Big Government –of World Government- with democratic methods; Moreover, World Government established by gradual reforms within the law, by avoiding direct confrontation and using cautious slow strategy to wear down any opposition. Tyrants also understand the corrupt and corruptible nature of men and democracy: for instance, Karl Marx, Rothschild crony and supposed founder of modern Communism:
Mikhail Gorbachev, former KGB chief and dictator of Soviet Russia in Perestroika - New Thinking for Our Country and the World:
Free government is founded in jealousy, and not in confidence. To repeat: the United States of America is not a democracy but a Republic.
"Democracy
1. A government of masses.
Republic
1. Authority is derived through the election by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them.
Consequently, those who work to establish World Empire understood immediately that the destruction of this great obstacle was a prerequisite of their secret agenda. For the New World Order to become a reality, national sovereignty, both the idea and actuality, had to be destroyed and because the United States of America is its last great expression then this bastion of freedom was the prime target of organised Evil behind the ancient agenda to establish World Empire. That is why the great experiment in human governance predicated on the Natural Moral Order, gifted to humanity by God and preserved for two centuries by the Constitution and Bill of Rights, has been subjected to remorseless subversion by those working to build a World Empire. The subtle non-human genius behind this Evil Agenda has used the industrious invention, power; might, ingenuity, magnanimity, innocence and arrogance of America to greatly accelerate the creation of the New World Order while simultaneously destroying the essence of America: "the land of the free and home of the brave" that was verily the beacon of hope for the dispossessed of the world. The evil and wicked architects of the agenda for World Empire understood that the spirituality that underpinned the establishment of America was that which underpinned Western civilisation, which is of course the Christ Impulse released from the Cross at Calvary. The majority of the Founding Fathers of America were Christians who used the Natural Moral Order described in such breathtaking ways in the Bible as the source and inspiration for their philosophical justifications of the sovereign state they created that was the United States of America. In short, the United States of America was founded as a Constitutional Republic of Sovereign States based upon Biblical principles and whose supreme law of the land was contained in the inspired document called the "Constitution of the United States" but ultimately that wisdom and truth found in "The Declaration of Independence." What one must understand in this great spiritual battle now raging about this Earth is the central role of the United States of America in the unfolding events in these End Times. That the ethos of the Founding Fathers of America was Christian; that the Natural Moral Order instilled into the idea of the Republic came from God and contained in the Bible; that the Constitution and Bill of Rights contain the Christian ideal of proper human governance; that sovereignty and personal freedoms are assured by this arrangement were all sufficient to make America the prime target of the wicked and evil leaders of the ancient, secret agenda for the establishment of a World Empire. A global governance based upon principles inimical to those arising from Natural Moral Order and personified by the idea that was the United States of America founded as a Constitutional Republic of Sovereign States: a World Empire predicated on tyranny and not the rule of law inspired by the Christ Impulse released from the Cross at Calvary. The Cult of Evil has been a perennial presence in the history of mankind that has worked ceaselessly to destroy God's moral order and rule on Earth. The Cult of Evil is the "hidden hand" behind much of what is called "History" and whose ultimate goal is world hegemony. The Cult of Evil is the ancient secret society dedicated to the worship of Evil that has gained almost total command over the secular affairs of the world because of its control over the secret societies, of which Freemasonry is its grandest expression, and through this, control over the vital organs of the modern world, especially the mass media, the political process, the intelligence agencies, the military and banking. Furthermore, people from other regions and cultures were welcomed and were free to practice their religion; however the predominant faith of America was Christianity. Yet there has been an orchestrated, organised effort to destroy the pristine nature of the United States of America founded as a Constitutional Republic of Sovereign States just as there has been an ancient orchestrated, organised effort to destroy Natural Moral Order on Earth. Most thinking people who understand these things can trace the history of this subversion with depressing ease. The main agent of the destruction of the United States as a Constitutional Republic is the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) an organisation integral to the projection of the power and aims of the Anglo-American Establishment and a cabal of people who are the de facto rulers of America. "The people elected and appointed to manage the affairs of the United States Government have in large measure become puppets, controlled by powerful persons working in and through a network of tax-exempt organizations. In short, the Council on Foreign Relations is the invisible government of the United States. The Council on Foreign Relations is a major front organisation of the power structure that rules the world today. The power behind the Council on Foreign Relations is hidden from public scrutiny and has been called a variety of names such as the Anglo-American Establishment, The Eastern Establishment, The Power Elite, The Ruling Class, Our Unelected Government, America's Invisible Government, The Secret Government, The Shadow Government, and The Military Industrial Complex while some referred to it simply as Wall Street. A power that has for the past century promoted wars and revolutions in pursuit of its goal of creating a New Social Order… the New World Order with its One World Government and One World Religion.
A power that has perforce sought to destroy the Old World Order, which is Western civilisation and the spirituality upon which its was founded- Christianity. And thus a power that has had in its sights the destruction of the United States of America as a Constitutional Republic of Sovereign States founded on Biblical principles. Professor Quigley in his influential book, Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in our Time (1966) describes how Rhodes organised a secret society for this purpose:
The Round Table Groups were semi-secret discussion and lobbying groups. . . . The original purpose of these groups was to seek to federate the English-speaking world along lines laid down by Cecil Rhodes. . . . It is the power structure that researchers of the calibre of Professors Carroll Quigley and Antony C. Sutton called the Anglo-American Establishment. It is however in effect the exoteric expression of the occult agenda of the secret society that rules the temporal affairs of this world. Primarily is the control it has gained over the political process and the mass media. The secret unelected rulers of the West…
To find the true source of the power behind the drive for World Empire one must look to the secret societies and then to their source, which is spiritual power… of a very peculiar kind.
What most commentators on the subject of the New World Order fail utterly to understand is the spiritual nature of the conspiracy. Any account of the phenomenon of the New World Order that leaves out the spiritual aspect is a flawed explanation at best that can only offer a partial and incomplete picture of the ancient Evil Agenda for World Empire. An ancient agenda of Evil that is the Great Conspiracy against God, Nature and mankind, which has been ever present throughout history. Furthermore, these flawed accounts name or accuse peoples, races, groups, organisations and dynastic families as the sole perpetrators or co-conspirators in the move to create World Empire. The forces behind the Great Conspiracy are spiritual powers and principalities that are called 'evil' by all that understand their proper nature and intentions. To find the true source of the power behind the drive for World Empire one must look to the dark Empire of the Secret Societies and then to their source, which is a spiritual power of a very peculiar kind. For, Evil is twofold, it comprises two contrasting Powers or Principalities, called in the Bible Lucifer and Satan, who are the dual faces of Evil. Lucifer and Satan (Ahriman) who are spirits of immense power and who are the Dark Gods of Evil, the true Lords of Power, who are behind every act inimical to Natural Moral Order on Earth for they truly desire to filch control of Creation and if this fails, then to crash it to the ground. Lucifer and Satan are very different spirits united in a diabolical lese majesty against God. Evil Powers have worked assiduously to ensnare mankind in a web of delusion and illusion whereby the spirit worlds are cloaked from its vision and terrestrial man is thereby isolated for eternity from the gods. Evil powers are the forces of Chaos that gain from man's spiritual impoverishment and the denial of his spiritual inheritance. They gain in strength by draining mankind of his innate spiritual powers. These Evil Powers are masters of cunning. The Overlords of Chaos, the Dark Gods of Evil, working to overthrow God and to strike down Nature are unremitting and diligent in their aim. They work ceaselessly in all spheres of existence and at all times to corrupt Nature and mankind. The Evil Agenda, the Great Conspiracy, encompasses many centuries and many generations, for its human adherents are worshippers of the Dark Gods, the Evil Powers, of Lucifer and of Satan who are truly the Overlords of Chaos. These human disciples of Evil do not deny the spiritual world; on the contrary, they worship gods in it: but what they worship are the Dark Gods who desire to tear down Creation. The human agents of Evil are the first to sneer and ridicule those who worship God or Christ because they are agents of deception who desire to cloak the higher spiritual realities from the masses. The unholy trinity that blasphemes against God and Creation are known by different names by different peoples and different times. Most people know the two main protagonists in this cabal as Lucifer and Satan; the third evil spirit is called Sorath, the sun demon. Lucifer and Satan are the powerful Evil spirits that have manifested through history in different guises. They represent the dual face of Evil that confronts mankind. The Beast is therefore the Evil spirit that the Bible often calls Satan and who was known to the Ancient Iranians as Angra Mainyu, the Evil Spirit or the Evil One of the Avestic or Zoroastrian religion. The first describes the Luciferic power; the second describes the Ahrimanic power. The insidious relationship between these two Evil Powers is this: the Luciferic power assails man in his inward life whereas the cold calculating Ahrimanic corruption acts through the social evil in the impersonal relationships of modern civilisation. It is the social evil working to corrupt the impersonal relationships between individuals, groups, and nations. Man separated from his true spiritual inheritance is prey to the inducements of the two Evil powers. The Evil forces at work in modern society have remorselessly attacked ancient morality that has sustained humanity and steered it away from the spiritual abyss. The alliance between the two Evil powers is not static. Consequently, the world had entered the time of the 'balance of terror' and Mutually Assured Destruction, a period in the world's history the prophet John the Divine called the 'Age of the Pale Horse'. The apparent ideological divide after the Second World War created the tensions that fuelled the mass paranoia called the 'Cold War'. The tenor of both systems is control of its people using the most modern computer technology to do so. The power to control the masses is derived from each of the Evil principalities. It served the purposes of the Evil hierarchy to have the 'ideal' socialist state as a belligerent to the 'free' world thereby creating the contrived tension of the specious 'Cold War'. It is nothing less than treason against God and Nature. The Great Conspiracy necessitates humanity marooned in the world of matter, wholly unaware of its natural spiritual inheritance.

Powered by: fvbwBulletin Version 3.0.7Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jack P. Arason When people are more aware of the consequences of policies of their governments, cross-cultural understanding increases, which leads to a more just and peaceful world ... That is the essence of the fvbw.org Mission.